Sasse Jo, Sands Roger
Forestry School, University of Melbourne, Creswick, Victoria 3363, Australia.
Tree Physiol. 1996 Jan-Feb;16(1_2):287-294. doi: 10.1093/treephys/16.1-2.287.
We compared responses of cuttings and seedlings of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. subsp. globulus to water stress in a 9-week greenhouse experiment. Optimal water availability was achieved by watering pots daily to field capacity, and two water stress treatments were imposed by reducing watering frequency to every 6 or 14 days. Within each treatment, height growth rates of cuttings and seedlings were similar, but the water-stress treatments reduced growth rates by up to 15%. Diameter growth rates were 25% lower in cuttings than in seedlings under well-watered conditions and were reduced by water stress in both plant types. Under well-watered conditions, cuttings and seedlings used similar amounts of water, whereas seedlings had greater water use (up to 28.5%) than cuttings in both water-stress treatments. Shoot water relations of cuttings and seedlings were similar over a range of soil water contents. The responses of transpiration and stomatal conductance to soil water content were similar in cuttings and seedlings. At the end of the experiment, plants were left unwatered. Seedlings that had been preconditioned by watering every 14 days survived to lower soil water contents than seedlings from the well-watered treatment; however, cuttings from the water-stress treatments died at higher soil water contents than either seedlings from the same treatment or cuttings from the well-watered treatment. We conclude that exposure to moderate water stress does not effectively precondition cuttings, and that their ability to resist extreme water stress may be limited. These characteristics are probably associated with the root systems of cuttings which differ developmentally, architecturally and anatomically from the root systems of seedlings.
在一项为期9周的温室试验中,我们比较了蓝桉(Eucalyptus globulus Labill. subsp. globulus)插条和幼苗对水分胁迫的响应。通过每天给花盆浇水至田间持水量来实现最佳水分供应,并通过将浇水频率降低至每6天或14天一次来施加两种水分胁迫处理。在每种处理中,插条和幼苗的高度生长速率相似,但水分胁迫处理使生长速率降低了多达15%。在水分充足的条件下,插条的直径生长速率比幼苗低25%,两种植株类型的直径生长速率均因水分胁迫而降低。在水分充足的条件下,插条和幼苗的耗水量相似,而在两种水分胁迫处理中,幼苗的耗水量均比插条大(高达28.5%)。在一系列土壤含水量范围内,插条和幼苗的地上部水分关系相似。插条和幼苗的蒸腾作用和气孔导度对土壤含水量的响应相似。在试验结束时,不再给植株浇水。每14天浇一次水预处理过的幼苗比水分充足处理的幼苗能在更低的土壤含水量下存活;然而,水分胁迫处理的插条在比相同处理的幼苗或水分充足处理的插条更高的土壤含水量下死亡。我们得出结论,暴露于中度水分胁迫并不能有效地预处理插条,并且它们抵抗极端水分胁迫的能力可能有限。这些特征可能与插条的根系有关,插条的根系在发育、结构和解剖学上与幼苗的根系不同。