Suppr超能文献

四种牙本质粘接材料的剪切粘接强度和微渗漏

Shear bond strengths and microleakage of four types of dentin adhesive materials.

作者信息

Ateyah Nasrien Z, Elhejazi Ahmed A

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dental Sciences of the College of Dentistry at King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2004 Feb 15;5(1):63-73.

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to compare the microleakage of composite resin (Z-100) and shear bond strength to bovine dentin using different types of adhesive systems (Scotch Bond Multi-Purpose, All-Bond 2, One-Step, and Perma Quick) to compare and correlate microleakage to shear bond strength. For the microleakage aspect of the study, 20 class V were prepared (bovine incisors) with 90-degree cavosurface margins and were located at the cemento-enamel junction using a template. Each dentin bonding system was applied to five cavities following the manufacturer's instructions and restored with Z-100 composite resin. After 24 hours of storage in distilled water at 37 degrees C, the teeth were immersed in 2% basic fuchsin dye. All teeth were sectioned in a mesiodistal direction using a diamond saw, and each section was then inspected under a stereomacroscope. For the shear bond strength aspect of the study, 20 bovine incisors were centrally horizontally mounted in Teflon mold with cold cure acrylic resin. Flat labial dentin surfaces were prepared using different grit silicon carbide abrasive wheels. Five specimens were used for each of the bonding agent systems. Each specimen was bonded with restorative composite resin (Z-100) and applied to the treated dentinal surface through a split Teflon mold. All specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours. The bonds were stressed using shear forces at a crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min using an Instron Universal testing machine. Findings indicate none of the systems tested in this study were free from microleakage. Scotch bond multi-purpose achieved the best seal, with One-Step being second best, while All-Bond 2 and Perma Quick had the poorest seal. However, there were significant differences among the shear bond strengths of the four bonding systems tested. Scotch Bond Multi-Purpose has a higher bond strength to composite resin when compared to the other dentin adhesives. The study also concluded there is no association between microleakage and shear bond strength.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较复合树脂(Z-100)的微渗漏情况以及使用不同类型的粘结系统(Scotch Bond多功能粘结剂、全粘结剂2、一步法粘结剂和Perma Quick)与牛牙本质之间的剪切粘结强度,以比较微渗漏与剪切粘结强度并建立两者之间的关联。对于该研究的微渗漏方面,制备了20个V类洞(牛切牙),洞缘呈90度,使用模板定位在牙骨质-釉质界处。按照制造商的说明,将每种牙本质粘结系统应用于五个洞,并用Z-100复合树脂进行修复。在37℃的蒸馏水中储存24小时后,将牙齿浸入2%的碱性品红染料中。使用金刚石锯沿近远中方向将所有牙齿切片,然后在体视显微镜下检查每个切片。对于该研究的剪切粘结强度方面,将20颗牛切牙水平居中安装在装有冷固化丙烯酸树脂的聚四氟乙烯模具中。使用不同粒度的碳化硅砂轮制备平坦的唇面牙本质表面。每种粘结剂系统使用五个样本。每个样本用修复性复合树脂(Z-100)粘结,并通过劈开的聚四氟乙烯模具应用于处理过的牙本质表面。所有样本在37℃的蒸馏水中储存24小时。使用Instron万能试验机以0.5mm/min的十字头速度施加剪切力对粘结进行加载。研究结果表明,本研究中测试的所有系统均存在微渗漏。Scotch Bond多功能粘结剂的封闭效果最佳,一步法粘结剂次之,而全粘结剂2和Perma Quick的封闭效果最差。然而,所测试的四种粘结系统的剪切粘结强度之间存在显著差异。与其他牙本质粘结剂相比,Scotch Bond多功能粘结剂与复合树脂的粘结强度更高。该研究还得出结论,微渗漏与剪切粘结强度之间不存在关联。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验