Carless P A, Henry D A, Moxey A J, O'Connell D, McClelland B, Henderson K M, Sly K, Laupacis A, Fergusson D
Discipline of Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Health, The University of Newcastle, Level 5, Clinical Sciences Building, Newcastle Mater Hospital, Edith Street, Waratah, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD001884. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001884.pub2.
Public concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have prompted re-consideration of the use of allogeneic (from an unrelated donor) red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and of a range of techniques designed to minimise transfusion requirements.
To examine the evidence for the efficacy of desmopressin acetate (1-deamino-8-D-arginine-vasopressin; DDAVP), in reducing perioperative blood loss and the need for red cell transfusion in patients who do not have congenital bleeding disorders.
Articles were identified by: computer searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents (to May 2003), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2003). References in the identified trials and review articles were searched and authors contacted to identify additional studies.
Controlled parallel group trials in which adult patients, scheduled for non-urgent surgery, were randomised to DDAVP, or to a control group, who did not receive the intervention.
Trial quality was assessed using criteria proposed by Schulz et al. (Schulz 1995) and Jadad et al. (Jadad 1996). Main outcomes measured were: the number of patients exposed to allogeneic red cell transfusion, and the amount of blood transfused. Other outcomes measured were: re-operation for bleeding, blood loss, post-operative complications (thrombosis, infection, non-fatal myocardial infarction), mortality, and length of hospital stay (LOS).
Eighteen trials of DDAVP (n=1295) reported data on the number of patients transfused with allogeneic RBC transfusion. In subjects treated with DDAVP, the pooled relative risk of exposure to perioperative allogeneic RBC transfusion was 0.95 (95%CI = 0.86 to 1.06). The use of DDAVP did not significantly reduce blood loss; weighted mean difference (WMD) = -114.3ml: 95% confidence interval (95%CI) = -258.8 to 30.2ml per patient) or the volume of RBC transfused (WMD = -0.35 units: 95%CI = -0.70 to 0.01 units). In DDAVP-treated patients the relative risk of requiring re-operation due to bleeding was 0.69 (95%CI = 0.26 to 1.83). There was no statistically significant effect overall for mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction in DDAVP-treated patients compared with control (RR = 1.72: 95%CI = 0.68 to 4.33) and (RR = 1.38: 95%CI = 0.77 to 2.50) respectively.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is no convincing evidence that desmopressin minimises perioperative allogeneic RBC transfusion in patients who do not have congenital bleeding disorders. These data suggest that there is no benefit from using DDAVP as a means of minimising perioperative allogeneic RBC transfusion.
公众对输血安全的担忧促使人们重新审视异体(来自非亲属供体)红细胞(RBC)输血的使用,以及一系列旨在尽量减少输血需求的技术。
研究醋酸去氨加压素(1-去氨基-8-D-精氨酸加压素;DDAVP)在减少非先天性出血性疾病患者围手术期失血及红细胞输血需求方面的疗效证据。
通过以下方式识别文章:对MEDLINE、EMBASE、《现刊目次》(截至2003年5月)和Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(Cochrane图书馆,2003年第1期)进行计算机检索。检索已识别试验和综述文章中的参考文献,并与作者联系以识别其他研究。
对照平行组试验,其中计划进行非急诊手术的成年患者被随机分为DDAVP组或未接受干预的对照组。
使用Schulz等人(Schulz 1995)和Jadad等人(Jadad 1996)提出的标准评估试验质量。测量的主要结局为:接受异体红细胞输血的患者数量和输血量。测量的其他结局为:因出血再次手术、失血量、术后并发症(血栓形成、感染、非致命性心肌梗死)、死亡率和住院时间(LOS)。
18项关于DDAVP的试验(n = 1295)报告了接受异体RBC输血患者数量的数据。在接受DDAVP治疗的受试者中,围手术期接受异体RBC输血的合并相对风险为0.95(95%CI = 0.86至1.06)。使用DDAVP并未显著减少失血量;加权平均差(WMD)=-114.3ml:95%置信区间(95%CI)=-258.8至30.2ml/患者)或RBC输血量(WMD = -0.35单位:95%CI = -0.70至0.01单位)。在接受DDAVP治疗的患者中,因出血需要再次手术的相对风险为0.69(95%CI = 0.26至1.83)。与对照组相比,DDAVP治疗患者的死亡率和非致命性心肌梗死总体上无统计学显著影响(RR = 1.72:95%CI = 0.68至4.33)和(RR = 1.38:95%CI = 0.77至2.50)。
没有令人信服的证据表明去氨加压素能减少非先天性出血性疾病患者围手术期的异体RBC输血。这些数据表明,使用DDAVP作为减少围手术期异体RBC输血的方法没有益处。