Addiss David, Critchley Julia, Ejere Henry, Garner Paul, Gelband Hellen, Gamble Carrol
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD003753. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003753.pub2.
Mass treatment with albendazole, co-administered with another antifilarial drug, is being promoted as part of a global programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis.
To assess the effects of albendazole on patients or populations with filarial infection, and on morbidity in patients with filarial infection; and to assess the frequency of adverse events for albendazole both given singly or in combination with another antifilarial drug (diethylcarbamazine or ivermectin).
We searched the Cochrane Infectious Disease Group's trial register (September 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2003), MEDLINE (September 2003), EMBASE (September 2003), LILACS (September 2003); and checked the reference lists and contacted experts, international organizations, and a pharmaceutical company.
Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials of albendazole singly or in combination with anti-filarial drugs in people or populations with lymphatic filariasis.
Two reviewers assessed eligibility and trial methodological quality. We calculated relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for binary outcomes, and where appropriate, combined them in a meta-analysis using the fixed effect model or random effects model.
Four small studies met the inclusion criteria (a total of 2473 children and adults, of whom 536 had detectable microfilariae). No effect of albendazole on microfilaraemia was demonstrated in two studies (placebo controlled, RR 0.97, 95%CI 0.87 to 1.09, n = 195). When compared to ivermectin, albendazole performed worse (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.98, 2 studies of patients initially microfilariae positive, n = 198). When compared to diethylcarbamazine, no statistically significant difference was detected, but numbers were small (n = 56). Two studies compared albendazole plus ivermectin to ivermectin alone on the presence of microfilaraemia. Results were mixed: one study showed the combination to be more effective (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.70, n = 52), but the other did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.25, n = 145). A further study compared albendazole plus diethylcarbamazine to diethylcarbamazine alone and did not demonstrate a difference on microfilaraemia prevalence (RR 1.57, 95% CI 0.44 to 5.60, n=35). No study examined the effects of the drugs on adult worms.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient reliable research to confirm or refute whether albendazole alone, or co-administered with diethylcarbamazine or ivermectin, has an effect on lymphatic filariasis.
阿苯达唑与另一种抗丝虫药物联合进行群体治疗,作为全球消除淋巴丝虫病计划的一部分正在推广。
评估阿苯达唑对丝虫感染患者或人群的影响,以及对丝虫感染患者发病率的影响;评估阿苯达唑单独使用或与另一种抗丝虫药物(乙胺嗪或伊维菌素)联合使用时不良事件的发生频率。
我们检索了Cochrane传染病组试验注册库(2003年9月)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(《Cochrane图书馆》2003年第3期)、MEDLINE(2003年9月)、EMBASE(2003年9月)、LILACS(2003年9月);并查阅了参考文献列表,联系了专家、国际组织和一家制药公司。
阿苯达唑单独或与抗丝虫药物联合用于淋巴丝虫病患者或人群的随机和半随机对照试验。
两名评价员评估纳入标准和试验方法学质量。我们计算了二分类结局的相对风险(RR)及其95%置信区间(CI),并在适当情况下,使用固定效应模型或随机效应模型将其合并进行Meta分析。
四项小型研究符合纳入标准(共2473名儿童和成人,其中536人可检测到微丝蚴)。两项研究(安慰剂对照,RR 0.97,95%CI 0.87至1.09,n = 195)未显示阿苯达唑对微丝蚴血症有影响。与伊维菌素相比,阿苯达唑效果较差(RR 0.84,95%CI 0.72至0.98,两项初始微丝蚴阳性患者的研究,n = 198)。与乙胺嗪相比,未检测到统计学显著差异,但样本量较小(n = 56)。两项研究比较了阿苯达唑加伊维菌素与单独使用伊维菌素对微丝蚴血症的影响。结果不一:一项研究显示联合用药更有效(RR 0.27,95%CI 0.11至0.70,n = 52),但另一项研究未显示统计学显著差异(RR 1.04,95%CI 0.87至1.25,n = 145)。另一项研究比较了阿苯达唑加乙胺嗪与单独使用乙胺嗪对微丝蚴血症患病率的影响,未显示差异(RR 1.57,95%CI 0.44至5.60,n = 35)。没有研究考察这些药物对成虫的影响。
没有足够可靠的研究来证实或反驳阿苯达唑单独使用,或与乙胺嗪或伊维菌素联合使用是否对淋巴丝虫病有影响。