• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Short- and long-term clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stents compared to conventional bare stents for patients with acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Lemos Pedro A, Saia Francesco, Hofma Sjoerd H, Daemen Joost, Ong Andrew T L, Arampatzis Chourmouzios A, Hoye Angela, McFadden Eugene, Sianos Georgios, Smits Pieter C, van der Giessen Willem J, de Feyter Pim, van Domburg Ron T, Serruys Patrick W

机构信息

Erasmus Medical Center, Thoraxcenter, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Feb 18;43(4):704-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.022.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.022
PMID:14975486
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the clinical outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) treated with sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) or with conventional bare stents.

BACKGROUND

The clinical impact of SES implantation for patients with ST-segment elevation MI is currently unknown.

METHODS

Primary angioplasty was performed with SESs in 186 consecutive patients with acute MI who were compared with 183 patients treated with bare stents. The incidence of death, reinfarction, and repeat revascularization was assessed at 30 and 300 days.

RESULTS

Postprocedure vessel patency, enzymatic release, and the incidence of short-term adverse events were similar in both the sirolimus and the bare stents (30-day rate of death, reinfarction, or repeat revascularization: 7.5% vs. 10.4%, respectively; p = 0.4). Stent thrombosis was not diagnosed in any patient in the sirolimus group and occurred in 1.6% of patients treated with bare stents (p = 0.1). At 300 days, treatment with SESs significantly reduced the incidence of combined adverse events (9.4% vs. 17%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.52 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30 to 0.92]; p = 0.02), mainly due to a marked reduction in the risk of repeat intervention (1.1% vs. 8.2%; HR 0.21 [95% CI 0.06 to 0.74]; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to conventional bare stents, the SESs were not associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis and were effective in reducing the incidence of adverse events at 300 days in unselected patients with ST-segment elevation acute MI referred for primary angioplasty.

摘要

相似文献

1
Short- and long-term clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stents compared to conventional bare stents for patients with acute myocardial infarction.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Feb 18;43(4):704-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.022.
2
Comparison of three-year clinical outcome of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the RESEARCH and T-SEARCH Registries).西罗莫司洗脱支架和紫杉醇洗脱支架与裸金属支架治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的三年临床结局比较(来自RESEARCH和T-SEARCH注册研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Apr 15;99(8):1027-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.11.070. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
3
Maintenance of long-term clinical benefit with sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction 3-year results of the SESAMI (sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent in acute myocardial infarction) trial.在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,西罗莫司洗脱支架的长期临床获益维持:SESAMI(急性心肌梗死中西罗莫司洗脱支架与裸金属支架比较)试验 3 年结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Feb 23;55(8):810-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.046.
4
Comparison of safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.雷帕霉素洗脱支架与裸金属支架在ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的安全性和有效性比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2006 May 1;97(9):1299-302. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.11.054. Epub 2006 Mar 10.
5
Unrestricted utilization of sirolimus-eluting stents compared with conventional bare stent implantation in the "real world": the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry.在“现实世界”中,与传统裸支架植入相比,西罗莫司洗脱支架的无限制使用:鹿特丹心脏病医院西罗莫司洗脱支架评估(RESEARCH)注册研究。
Circulation. 2004 Jan 20;109(2):190-5. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000109138.84579.FA. Epub 2003 Dec 22.
6
Sirolimus, Tacrolimus and Zotarolimus eluting stents to treat bifurcated lesions: a 7-month clinical outcome comparison.西罗莫司、他克莫司和佐他莫司洗脱支架治疗分叉病变:7个月临床结果比较
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2008 Feb;56(1):35-42.
7
Effect of coronary target lesion revascularization on late cardiac events after insertion of sirolimus-eluting or bare metal stents.冠状动脉靶病变血运重建对西罗莫司洗脱支架或金属裸支架置入后晚期心脏事件的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Sep 15;106(6):774-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.04.039. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
8
Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: a clinical and angiographic study.西罗莫司洗脱支架植入术治疗ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死:一项临床及血管造影研究。
Circulation. 2003 Oct 21;108(16):1927-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000096053.87580.CD. Epub 2003 Oct 13.
9
Long-term clinical outcomes of sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: analysis of the MAIN-COMPARE (revascularization for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis: comparison of percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus surgical revascularization) registry.西罗莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者的长期临床结局:MAIN-COMPARE(无保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄血运重建:经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术与外科血运重建比较)注册研究分析
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Aug 25;54(9):853-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.071.
10
Long-term clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for treatment of restenosis within bare-metal versus drug-eluting stents.西罗莫司洗脱支架植入治疗裸金属支架与药物洗脱支架内再狭窄后的长期临床结局。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Apr 1;71(5):594-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21399.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of the impact of current smoking on 2-year major clinical outcomes of first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents in acute myocardial infarction: Data from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry.当前吸烟对急性心肌梗死患者第一代和第二代药物洗脱支架2年主要临床结局影响的比较:来自韩国急性心肌梗死注册研究的数据
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar;98(10):e14797. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014797.
2
Five-year major clinical outcomes between first-generation and second-generation drug-eluting stents in acute myocardial infarction patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者中,第一代和第二代药物洗脱支架的五年主要临床结局。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2018 Aug;15(8):523-533. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.08.006.
3
Drug-eluting stents in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.药物洗脱支架在急性心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用
Neth Heart J. 2006 Apr;14(4):123-124.
4
The use of drug-eluting stents in acute myocardial infarction - is the battle coming to an end? From despair to acceptance.药物洗脱支架在急性心肌梗死中的应用——这场争论即将结束?从绝望到接受。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2013;9(1):50-4. doi: 10.5114/pwki.2013.34028. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
5
Xiongshao for restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with coronary heart disease.芎芍防治冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入术后再狭窄的研究
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;2013(5):CD009581. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009581.pub2.
6
Comparison of drug-eluting stents in acute myocardial infarction patients with chronic kidney disease.比较药物洗脱支架在急性心肌梗死合并慢性肾脏病患者中的应用。
Korean J Intern Med. 2012 Dec;27(4):397-406. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2012.27.4.397. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
7
Comparison of outcome in 1809 patients treated with drug-eluting stents or bare-metal stents in a real-world setting.1809例患者在真实临床环境中接受药物洗脱支架或裸金属支架治疗的疗效比较。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011;7:693-9. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S24370. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
8
Long-term outcome of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for left main coronary artery stenosis in infancy.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2011 Jan;32(1):94-7. doi: 10.1007/s00246-010-9815-5. Epub 2010 Oct 24.
9
Long-term outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation in comparison with bare metal stents: a single centre experience.药物洗脱支架置入与金属裸支架置入的长期结果比较:单中心经验。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2011 Mar;100(3):191-200. doi: 10.1007/s00392-010-0228-5. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
10
Long-term clinical outcomes of drug-eluting stents vs bare-metal stents in Chinese patients.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架在中国患者中的长期临床结局。
Clin Cardiol. 2010 Jun;33(6):E22-9. doi: 10.1002/clc.20655.