• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Drug-eluting stents in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Hofma S H, van Boven A J

出版信息

Neth Heart J. 2006 Apr;14(4):123-124.

PMID:25696609
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2557166/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Drug-eluting stents in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.药物洗脱支架在急性心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用
Neth Heart J. 2006 Apr;14(4):123-124.
2
5-year follow-up after primary percutaneous coronary intervention with a paclitaxel-eluting stent versus a bare-metal stent in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a follow-up study of the PASSION (Paclitaxel-Eluting Versus Conventional Stent in Myocardial Infarction with ST-Segment Elevation) trial.急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行紫杉醇洗脱支架与金属裸支架初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 5 年随访：PASSION（紫杉醇洗脱支架与心肌梗死 ST 段抬高患者常规支架比较）试验的随访研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jan;4(1):24-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.11.003.
3
Frequency and predictors of stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后支架血栓形成的频率及预测因素。
Circulation. 2011 Apr 26;123(16):1745-56. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.981688. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
4
Long-term effects of drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents on patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: outcomes of 3-year clinical follow-up.药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架对行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的长期影响：3 年临床随访结果。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Aug;125(16):2803-6.
5
Prediction of 1-year clinical outcomes using the SYNTAX score in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a substudy of the STRATEGY (Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Abciximab and Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and MULTISTRATEGY (Multicenter Evaluation of Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban Versus Abciximab With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent or Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study) trials.应用 SYNTAX 评分预测行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者 1 年临床结局：STRATEGY（单次大剂量替罗非班和西罗莫司洗脱支架与阿昔单抗和裸金属支架治疗急性心肌梗死）和 MULTISTRATEGY（多中心评价单次大剂量替罗非班与阿昔单抗联合西罗莫司洗脱支架或裸金属支架治疗急性心肌梗死研究）试验的一项亚研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jan;4(1):66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.09.017.
6
Persistent coronary no flow after wire insertion is an early and readily available mortality risk factor despite successful mechanical intervention in acute myocardial infarction: a pooled analysis from the STRATEGY (Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Abciximab and Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and MULTISTRATEGY (Multicenter Evaluation of Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban Versus Abciximab With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent or Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study) trials.尽管在急性心肌梗死中成功进行了机械干预，但导丝插入后持续无复流是一个早期且易于获得的死亡风险因素：来自 STRATEGY（单次大剂量替罗非班和西罗莫司洗脱支架与阿昔单抗和裸金属支架治疗急性心肌梗死）和 MULTISTRATEGY（多中心评估单次大剂量替罗非班与阿昔单抗与西罗莫司洗脱支架或裸金属支架治疗急性心肌梗死的研究）试验的汇总分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jan;4(1):51-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.09.016.
7
Incidence, predictors, and implications of reinfarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: the Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial.ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后再梗死的发生率、预测因素及影响：急性心肌梗死血管重建和支架置入的协调结果试验
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(4):543-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001360. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
8
Drug-eluting stents in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an up-to-date review of the literature.药物洗脱支架在ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用：文献综述
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2009 Oct;57(5):645-55.
9
Does Large Vessel Size Justify Use of Bare-Metal Stents in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention?大血管直径是否支持在初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中使用裸金属支架？
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep;12(9):e007705. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007705. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
10
Second-generation everolimus-eluting stents versus first-generation sirolimus-eluting stents in acute myocardial infarction. 1-year results of the randomized XAMI (XienceV Stent vs. Cypher Stent in Primary PCI for Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial.急性心肌梗死中第二代依维莫司洗脱支架与第一代西罗莫司洗脱支架的比较。随机 XAMI（XienceV 支架与 Cypher 支架在急性心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的比较）试验的 1 年结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jul 31;60(5):381-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.01.073.

本文引用的文献

1
One year clinical follow up of paclitaxel eluting stents for acute myocardial infarction compared with sirolimus eluting stents.紫杉醇洗脱支架与西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗急性心肌梗死的一年临床随访
Heart. 2005 Sep;91(9):1176-80. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.064519. Epub 2005 May 9.
2
Tirofiban and sirolimus-eluting stent vs abciximab and bare-metal stent for acute myocardial infarction: a randomized trial.替罗非班与西罗莫司洗脱支架对比阿昔单抗与裸金属支架治疗急性心肌梗死：一项随机试验
JAMA. 2005 May 4;293(17):2109-17. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.17.2109.
3
Is routine stenting for acute myocardial infarction superior to balloon angioplasty? A randomised comparison in a large cohort of unselected patients.急性心肌梗死的常规支架置入术是否优于球囊血管成形术？一项针对大量未选择患者的随机对照研究。
Heart. 2005 May;91(5):641-5. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.056705.
4
Short- and long-term clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stents compared to conventional bare stents for patients with acute myocardial infarction.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Feb 18;43(4):704-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.022.
5
Outcomes of optimal or "stent-like"balloon angioplasty in acutemyocardial infarction: the CADILLAC trial.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Sep 17;42(6):971-7. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00911-2.
6
Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死中血管成形术与支架置入术（无论是否使用阿昔单抗）的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 28;346(13):957-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013404.