Reznick R, Smee S, Rothman A, Chalmers A, Swanson D, Dufresne L, Lacombe G, Baumber J, Poldre P, Levasseur L
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto (UT), Ontario.
Acad Med. 1992 Aug;67(8):487-94. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199208000-00001.
The Medical Council of Canada (MCC) administers a qualifying examination for the issuance of a license to practice medicine. To date, this examination does not test the clinical skills of history taking, physical examination, and communication. The MCC is implementing an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) to test these skills in October 1992. A pilot examination was developed to test the feasibility, reliability, and validity of running a multisite, two-form, four-hour, 20-station OSCE for national licensure. In February 1991, 240 volunteer first- and second-year residents were tested at four sites. The candidates were randomly assigned to one of two forms of the test and one of two sites for two of the four sites. Generalizability analysis revealed that the variance due to form was 0.0 and that due to site was .16 compared with a total variance of 280.86. The reliabilities (inter-station) were .56 and .60 for the two forms. Station total-test score correlations, used to measure station validity, were significant for 38 of the 40 stations used (range .14-.60). The results of the OSCE correlated moderately with the MCC qualifying examination; these correlations were .32 and .35 for the two test forms. Content validity was assessed by postexamination questionnaires given to the physician examiners using a scale of 0 (low) to 10 (high). The physicians' mean ratings were: importance of the stations, 8.1 (SD, 1.8); success of the examination in testing core skills, 8.1 (SD, 1.6); and degree of challenge, 7.8 (SD, 2.1). The results indicate that a full-scale national administration of an OSCE for licensure is feasible using the model developed. Aspects of validity have been established and strategies to augment reliability have been developed.
加拿大医学委员会(MCC)负责管理一项资格考试,以颁发行医执照。迄今为止,该考试并不测试病史采集、体格检查和沟通等临床技能。MCC正在实施一项客观结构化临床考试(OSCE),将于1992年10月测试这些技能。开展了一项试点考试,以测试为全国性执照考试运行一个多站点、两种形式、四小时、20个站点的OSCE的可行性、可靠性和有效性。1991年2月,240名志愿参加的一年级和二年级住院医师在四个站点接受了测试。考生被随机分配到两种测试形式之一,并被分配到四个站点中的两个站点之一。概化分析显示,形式因素导致的方差为0.0,站点因素导致的方差为0.16,而总方差为280.86。两种形式的可靠性(站点间)分别为0.56和0.60。用于衡量站点有效性的站点总分相关性,在所使用的40个站点中有38个站点是显著的(范围为0.14 - 0.60)。OSCE的结果与MCC资格考试呈中等程度相关;两种测试形式的相关性分别为0.32和0.35。通过向医师考官发放考试后问卷来评估内容效度,问卷采用0(低)至10(高)的评分标准。医师的平均评分如下:站点的重要性,8.1(标准差,1.8);考试在测试核心技能方面的成功程度,8.1(标准差,1.6);以及挑战程度,7.8(标准差,2.1)。结果表明,使用所开发的模式对OSCE进行全面的全国性执照考试管理是可行的。已经确立了效度方面的内容,并制定了提高可靠性的策略。