de Montbrun Sandra, Louridas Marisa, Grantcharov Teodor
J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Jun;9(3):324-329. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00517.1.
The ability of an assessment to predict performance would be of major benefit to residency programs, allowing for early identification of residents at risk.
We sought to establish whether passing the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) examination in postgraduate year 1 (PGY-1) predicts future performance.
Between 2002 and 2012, 133 PGY-1 surgery residents at the University of Toronto (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) completed an 8-station, simulated OSATS examination as a component of training. With recently set passing scores, residents were assigned a pass/fail status using 3 standards setting methods (contrasting groups, borderline group, and borderline regression). Future in-training performance was compared between residents who had passed and those who failed the OSATS, using in-training evaluation reports from resident files. A Mann-Whitney test compared performance among groups at PGY-2 and PGY-4 levels.
Residents who passed the OSATS examination outperformed those who failed, when compared during PGY-2 across all 3 standard setting methodologies ( < .05). During PGY-4, only the contrasting groups method showed a significant difference ( < .05).
We found that PGY-1 surgical resident pass/fail status on a technical skills examination was associated with future performance on in-training evaluation reports in later years. This provides validity evidence for the current PGY-1 pass/fail score, and suggests that this technical skills examination may be used to predict performance and to identify residents who require remediation.
评估预测表现的能力对住院医师培训项目具有重大益处,有助于早期识别有风险的住院医师。
我们试图确定在研究生一年级(PGY-1)通过客观结构化技术技能评估(OSATS)考试是否能预测未来的表现。
2002年至2012年期间,加拿大多伦多大学(安大略省多伦多)的133名PGY-1外科住院医师完成了一项8站式模拟OSATS考试,作为培训的一部分。根据最近设定的及格分数,使用三种标准设定方法(对比组、临界组和临界回归)为住院医师确定及格/不及格状态。利用住院医师档案中的培训期间评估报告,比较通过和未通过OSATS考试的住院医师未来的培训表现。采用曼-惠特尼检验比较PGY-2和PGY-4水平组之间的表现。
在PGY-2期间,采用所有三种标准设定方法比较时,通过OSATS考试的住院医师表现优于未通过者(<0.05)。在PGY-4期间,只有对比组方法显示出显著差异(<0.05)。
我们发现,PGY-1外科住院医师在技术技能考试中的及格/不及格状态与后期培训期间评估报告中的未来表现相关。这为当前PGY-1的及格/不及格分数提供了效度证据,并表明该技术技能考试可用于预测表现和识别需要补习的住院医师。