• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

压疮风险评估——简单还是复杂?

Pressure ulcer risk assessment--simple or complex?

作者信息

Hergenroeder P, Mosher C, Sevo D

出版信息

Decubitus. 1992 Jul;5(4):47-8, 50-2.

PMID:1497807
Abstract

A descriptive comparison study was carried out to determine whether there was a difference between a staff nurse's single-item pressure ulcer risk assessment and a risk assessment using the Braden Scale. Seventy-two medical patients participated in the study. Statistical analysis of the data indicated nurses were accurate in predicting pressure ulcer risk with a simple YES/NO answer. The mean Braden Score for those patients indicated at risk by the nurse was 14.45, and 20.24 for those assessed to be not at risk. This study indicates that nurses' good judgement is as reliable as more complicated tools in determining pressure ulcer risk. Further studies comparing risk assessment tools are recommended.

摘要

开展了一项描述性比较研究,以确定护士的单项压疮风险评估与使用Braden量表进行的风险评估之间是否存在差异。72名内科患者参与了该研究。数据的统计分析表明,护士通过简单的“是/否”回答就能准确预测压疮风险。护士评估为有风险的患者的Braden评分均值为14.45,评估为无风险的患者的Braden评分均值为20.24。本研究表明,在确定压疮风险方面,护士的良好判断力与更复杂的工具一样可靠。建议进一步开展比较风险评估工具的研究。

相似文献

1
Pressure ulcer risk assessment--simple or complex?压疮风险评估——简单还是复杂?
Decubitus. 1992 Jul;5(4):47-8, 50-2.
2
Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.在中国内地的急症医院中,使用改良版Braden量表、Braden量表和Norton量表预测压疮风险。
Appl Nurs Res. 2005 May;18(2):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2005.01.001.
3
Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.重症监护压力性溃疡风险评估:Braden 和 Waterlow 量表及两个重症监护病房主观评估的评分者间信度和效度研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Jun;47(6):671-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.005. Epub 2009 Dec 8.
4
An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.一项在家庭护理环境中使用Braden量表评估压疮风险及压疮分类的评分者间信度研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Oct;46(10):1307-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.03.014. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
5
An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes.在两家养老院对Braden量表进行的评分者间信度研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Oct;45(10):1501-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.02.007.
6
Pressure ulcers: validation of two risk assessment scales.压疮:两种风险评估量表的验证
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Mar;14(3):373-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01058.x.
7
Multisite Web-based training in using the Braden Scale to predict pressure sore risk.基于网络的多站点培训,内容为使用Braden量表预测压疮风险。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2008 Mar;21(3):124-33. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000305420.73597.d2.
8
Pressure ulcer risk assessment immediately after cardiac surgery--does it make a difference? A comparison of three pressure ulcer risk assessment instruments within a cardiac surgery population.心脏手术后立即进行压疮风险评估——会有不同吗?心脏手术人群中三种压疮风险评估工具的比较。
Nurs Crit Care. 2007 Jan-Feb;12(1):42-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2006.00198.x.
9
Computer-based testing of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.用于预测压疮风险的Braden量表的计算机化测试。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2005 Apr;51(4):40-2, 44, 46 passim.
10
The incidence of pressure ulcers in surgical patients: a sample hospital in Turkey.土耳其一家样本医院外科患者压疮的发生率
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Apr;15(4):413-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01369.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Preventing and treating pressure sores.预防和治疗压疮。
Qual Health Care. 1995 Dec;4(4):289-97. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.4.289.