Suppr超能文献

压疮风险评估——简单还是复杂?

Pressure ulcer risk assessment--simple or complex?

作者信息

Hergenroeder P, Mosher C, Sevo D

出版信息

Decubitus. 1992 Jul;5(4):47-8, 50-2.

PMID:1497807
Abstract

A descriptive comparison study was carried out to determine whether there was a difference between a staff nurse's single-item pressure ulcer risk assessment and a risk assessment using the Braden Scale. Seventy-two medical patients participated in the study. Statistical analysis of the data indicated nurses were accurate in predicting pressure ulcer risk with a simple YES/NO answer. The mean Braden Score for those patients indicated at risk by the nurse was 14.45, and 20.24 for those assessed to be not at risk. This study indicates that nurses' good judgement is as reliable as more complicated tools in determining pressure ulcer risk. Further studies comparing risk assessment tools are recommended.

摘要

开展了一项描述性比较研究,以确定护士的单项压疮风险评估与使用Braden量表进行的风险评估之间是否存在差异。72名内科患者参与了该研究。数据的统计分析表明,护士通过简单的“是/否”回答就能准确预测压疮风险。护士评估为有风险的患者的Braden评分均值为14.45,评估为无风险的患者的Braden评分均值为20.24。本研究表明,在确定压疮风险方面,护士的良好判断力与更复杂的工具一样可靠。建议进一步开展比较风险评估工具的研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验