Suppr超能文献

大便失禁的结局指标:肛门直肠结构与功能

Outcome measures for fecal incontinence: anorectal structure and function.

作者信息

Bharucha Adil E

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

出版信息

Gastroenterology. 2004 Jan;126(1 Suppl 1):S90-8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.014.

Abstract

Fecal incontinence is a symptom attributable to a variety of disorders affecting one or more factors that maintain continence. Objective assessments should complement symptom assessments as outcome measures in therapeutic trials; conceivably, these assessments may also predict the response to therapy. Consistent with existing trends, most therapeutic trials should incorporate anal sphincter pressures and rectal sensation as outcome variables, paying meticulous attention to techniques. Rectal sensation is increased after pelvic floor retraining by biofeedback therapy in fecal incontinence; however, the predictive value of improved anal pressures after biofeedback has not been clearly established. Other factors maintaining continence can be assessed by newer approaches. In addition to assessing rectal sensation, a barostat also measures rectal compliance; alterations in rectal compliance modulate rectal perception. Particularly appropriate end points for trials involving surgical repair are sphincter integrity, assessed by endoanal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and puborectalis and pelvic floor motion, assessed by dynamic MRI. Despite disagreement about which technique is superior for evaluating the internal sphincter, MRI performs the same or better than ultrasound for assessing the external sphincter. The utility of measuring pudendal nerve latencies as a marker of pudendal nerve injury is limited; needle electromyography provides a sensitive measure of denervation and can usually identify myopathic damage, neurogenic damage, or mixed injury. These standardized, reproducible assessments of the multifaceted mechanisms maintaining fecal incontinence should be incorporated as outcome variables in therapeutic trials of fecal incontinence.

摘要

大便失禁是一种症状,可归因于多种影响一种或多种维持控便功能因素的疾病。在治疗试验中,客观评估应作为结果指标补充症状评估;可以想象,这些评估还可能预测对治疗的反应。与现有趋势一致,大多数治疗试验应将肛门括约肌压力和直肠感觉作为结果变量,并密切关注技术细节。在大便失禁患者中,通过生物反馈疗法进行盆底再训练后直肠感觉增强;然而,生物反馈后肛门压力改善的预测价值尚未明确确立。维持控便功能的其他因素可通过更新的方法进行评估。除了评估直肠感觉外,压力测定仪还可测量直肠顺应性;直肠顺应性的改变会调节直肠感觉。对于涉及手术修复的试验,特别合适的终点指标包括通过肛管内超声或磁共振成像(MRI)评估的括约肌完整性,以及通过动态MRI评估的耻骨直肠肌和盆底运动。尽管对于哪种技术在评估内括约肌方面更优越存在分歧,但在评估外括约肌方面,MRI的表现与超声相同或更好。将阴部神经潜伏期作为阴部神经损伤标志物进行测量的效用有限;针极肌电图可提供去神经的敏感测量,通常能够识别肌病性损伤、神经源性损伤或混合性损伤。这些对维持大便失禁的多方面机制进行的标准化、可重复评估应作为大便失禁治疗试验的结果变量纳入其中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验