1] Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA [2] Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Floor Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Gastroenterology, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan;110(1):138-46; quiz 147. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.303. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
This is the second of a two-part summary of a National Institutes of Health conference on fecal incontinence (FI) that summarizes current treatments and identifies research priorities. Conservative medical management consisting of patient education, fiber supplements or antidiarrheals, behavioral techniques such as scheduled toileting, and pelvic floor exercises restores continence in up to 25% of patients. Biofeedback, often recommended as first-line treatment after conservative management fails, produces satisfaction with treatment in up to 76% and continence in 55%; however, outcomes depend on the skill of the therapist, and some trials are less favorable. Electrical stimulation of the anal mucosa is ineffective, but continuous electrical pulsing of sacral nerves produces a ≥50% reduction in FI frequency in a median 73% of patients. Tibial nerve electrical stimulation with needle electrodes is promising but remains unproven. Sphincteroplasty produces short-term clinical improvement in a median 67%, but 5-year outcomes are poor. Injecting an inert bulking agent around the anal canal led to ≥50% reductions of FI in up to 53% of patients. Colostomy is used as a last resort because of adverse effects on quality of life. Several new devices are under investigation but not yet approved. FI researchers identify the following priorities for future research: (1) trials comparing the effectiveness, safety, and cost of current therapies; (2) studies addressing barriers to consulting for care; and (3) translational research on regenerative medicine. Unmet patient needs include FI in special populations (e.g., neurological disorders and nursing home residents) and improvements in behavioral treatments.
这是美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)关于粪便失禁(FI)会议的两部分总结中的第二部分,总结了当前的治疗方法并确定了研究重点。保守的医学管理包括患者教育、纤维补充剂或止泻药、行为技术(如定时排便)和盆底运动,可以使多达 25%的患者恢复正常。生物反馈通常被推荐为保守治疗失败后的一线治疗方法,其治疗满意度可达 76%,治愈率为 55%;然而,治疗效果取决于治疗师的技能,一些试验结果并不乐观。肛门黏膜电刺激无效,但骶神经持续电脉冲可使 73%的患者 FI 频率降低≥50%。胫神经电刺激用针电极有前途,但仍未得到证实。括约肌成形术可使 67%的患者在中期获得临床改善,但 5 年的结果不佳。将惰性膨胀剂注射到肛门周围可使多达 53%的患者 FI 减少≥50%。由于对生活质量的不良影响,结肠造口术被用作最后的手段。一些新的设备正在研究中,但尚未获得批准。FI 研究人员确定了未来研究的以下优先事项:(1)比较当前治疗方法的有效性、安全性和成本的试验;(2)研究解决咨询护理障碍的问题;(3)关于再生医学的转化研究。未满足的患者需求包括特殊人群(如神经疾病和养老院居民)的 FI 以及行为治疗的改善。