Treboux Dominique, Crowell Judith A, Waters Everett
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Dev Psychol. 2004 Mar;40(2):295-314. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.295.
Two studies addressed the implications of concordance versus discrepancy of attachment representations in individuals at 2 stages in their marital relationships. Engaged (n = 157) and dating (n = 101) couples participated in a multimethod 6-year longitudinal study of adult attachment. Individuals completed the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI), the Current Relationship Interview (CRI), and various questionnaires and were observed in interactions with partners. On the basis of AAI and CRI classifications, participants were placed in one of four groups: Secure-sub(AAI)/Secure-sub(CRI), Secure-sub(AAI)/Insecure-sub(CRI), Insecure-sub(AAI)/Secure-sub(CRI), or Insecure-sub(AAI)/Insecure-sub(CRI). Each of the configurations showed a particular pattern of behavior, feelings about relationships and the self, and likelihood of relationship breakup. The findings of the studies address important points about the protective effects of attachment security and have interesting implications for the extension of attachment theory into adulthood.
两项研究探讨了婚姻关系中两个阶段的个体在依恋表征上的一致性与差异所带来的影响。订婚情侣（n = 157）和约会情侣（n = 101）参与了一项关于成人依恋的多方法6年纵向研究。个体完成了成人依恋访谈（AAI）、当前关系访谈（CRI）以及各种问卷，并在与伴侣的互动中接受观察。根据AAI和CRI的分类，参与者被分为四组之一：安全型-主体（AAI）/安全型-主体（CRI）、安全型-主体（AAI）/不安全型-主体（CRI）、不安全型-主体（AAI）/安全型-主体（CRI）或不安全型-主体（AAI）/不安全型-主体（CRI）。每种组合都呈现出一种特定的行为模式、对关系和自我的感受以及关系破裂的可能性。这些研究结果阐述了关于依恋安全性的保护作用的重要观点，并对依恋理论延伸至成年期具有有趣的启示。
