Suppr超能文献

不同粘接系统在骨与复合材料之间的拉伸粘接强度比较:一项体外研究。

Tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems between bone and composite compared: an in vitro study.

作者信息

Maurer Peter, Bekes Katrin, Gernhardt Christian R, Schaller Hans-Günter, Schubert Johannes

机构信息

Department of Oral and Plastic Maxillofacial Surgery, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.

出版信息

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2004 Apr;32(2):85-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2003.11.001.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim was to compare tensile bond strength of three dentine adhesive systems (Excite, Clearfil New Bond, Etch & Prime 3.0) and two cyanoacrylate adhesives (Cyano Veneer, Histoacryl) to animal bone in vitro.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Specimens from five porcine mandibles (diameter 9 mm) with a total thickness of 4mm (+/-0.5mm) and a cortical layer of 1.5mm (+/-0.2mm) were prepared using trephine burs under constant water cooling and under standardized conditions. They were assigned to five experimental groups. Tensile bond strength of five different adhesive agents (Clearfil New Bond, Etch & Prime 3.0, Excite, Histoacryl and Cyano Veneer was measured 15 min after application and after light curing of a composite material (Tetric Ceram, colour A2) added thereupon using a universal testing machine. Qualitative control was performed by scanning electron microscopy, while examining loaded and unloaded specimens.

RESULTS

The measured tensile bond strength was as follows: Clearfil New Bond 8.00 MPa (+/-1.36 MPa), Etch & Prime 3.0 4.05 MPa (+/-1.52 MPa), Excite 2.96 MPa (+/-1.34 MPa), Histoacryl 5.22 MPa (+/-2.00 MPa), Cyano Veneer 4.56 MPa (+/-0.76 MPa). Clearfil New Bond showed significantly higher bond strength than the other four adhesives. Scanning electron microscopy analysis of unloaded specimens showed mixed modes of fracture. As regards the loaded specimens, no tag formation as known for dentine was found.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of an in vitro investigation it can be concluded that dentine adhesive systems might be useful for bone bonding. Tensile bond strength of the dentine adhesive systems tested on bone is comparable to that evaluated for dentine in earlier investigations.

摘要

引言

目的是在体外比较三种牙本质粘结系统(Excite、Clearfil New Bond、Etch & Prime 3.0)和两种氰基丙烯酸酯类胶粘剂(Cyano Veneer、Histoacryl)与动物骨的拉伸粘结强度。

材料与方法

使用环钻在恒水冷和标准化条件下,从五头猪的下颌骨制备标本(直径9mm),总厚度为4mm(±0.5mm),皮质层为1.5mm(±0.2mm)。将它们分为五个实验组。在使用通用测试机施加并光固化复合材料(Tetric Ceram,颜色A2)15分钟后,测量五种不同胶粘剂(Clearfil New Bond、Etch & Prime 3.0、Excite、Histoacryl和Cyano Veneer)的拉伸粘结强度。通过扫描电子显微镜对加载和未加载的标本进行检查,进行定性控制。

结果

测得的拉伸粘结强度如下:Clearfil New Bond为8.00MPa(±1.36MPa),Etch & Prime 3.0为4.05MPa(±1.52MPa),Excite为2.96MPa(±1.34MPa),Histoacryl为5.22MPa(±2.00MPa),Cyano Veneer为4. .56MPa(±0.76MPa)。Clearfil New Bond显示出比其他四种胶粘剂显著更高的粘结强度。对未加载标本的扫描电子显微镜分析显示出混合断裂模式。对于加载的标本,未发现牙本质中已知的标签形成。

结论

在体外研究的局限性内,可以得出结论,牙本质粘结系统可能对骨粘结有用。在骨上测试的牙本质粘结系统的拉伸粘结强度与早期研究中对牙本质评估的强度相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验