Khan Z M, Vanderberg J P
Department of Medical and Molecular Parasitology, New York University School of Medicine, NY 10016.
Int Immunol. 1992 Jul;4(7):711-8. doi: 10.1093/intimm/4.7.711.
We compared immunization of BALB/c mice with radiation-attenuated versus killed sporozoites of the rodent malaria parasite, Plasmodium yoelii. We employed a suboptimal schedule of only two immunizations, in expectation that some parasites might break through the resultant low level immunity and that it might thus be possible to study the response of the host against these 'breakthrough' schizonts. As a measure of protective immunity, we used histological means to determine the percentages of challenge sporozoites prevented from completing development into hepatic schizonts within the liver. Immunization with attenuated sporozoites led to almost complete protection, whereas immunization with similar dosages of killed sporozoites led to approximately a 75% protection. Fluorescent antibody titers against sporozoites were similar in both sets of immunized animals. However, serum from mice immunized with attenuated sporozoites had a protective effect upon passive transfer into immunologically naive mice subsequently challenged with normal sporozoites; serum from mice immunized with killed sporozoites had no such effect. When mice suboptimally immunized with attenuated sporozoites were challenged, we observed breakthrough schizonts being infiltrated with inflammatory cells, primarily mononuclear cells, and neutrophils; partial depletion of CD4+ or CD8+ cells within these mice prior to challenge prevented the infiltration of breakthrough schizonts. Thus, cellular infiltration of schizonts was apparently secondary to earlier action by lymphocytes. This infiltration was also not observed in mice immunized with killed sporozoites. The more effective protective immunity induced by attenuated sporozoites could be due to their ability to release antigen into the cytoplasm of hepatocytes that they invade or their ability to continue differentiating, thereby presenting new antigens that are not seen after immunization with killed sporozoites.
我们比较了用辐射减毒的约氏疟原虫子孢子与灭活的约氏疟原虫子孢子对BALB/c小鼠进行免疫的效果。我们采用了仅两次免疫的次优方案,预期一些寄生虫可能突破由此产生的低水平免疫,从而有可能研究宿主对这些“突破”裂殖体的反应。作为保护性免疫的一种衡量方法,我们使用组织学手段来确定被阻止在肝脏内发育成肝内裂殖体的攻击子孢子的百分比。用减毒子孢子免疫几乎可导致完全保护,而用相同剂量的灭活子孢子免疫则导致约75%的保护率。两组免疫动物针对子孢子的荧光抗体滴度相似。然而,用减毒子孢子免疫的小鼠血清在被动转移到随后用正常子孢子攻击的免疫幼稚小鼠时具有保护作用;用灭活子孢子免疫的小鼠血清则没有这种作用。当用减毒子孢子进行次优免疫的小鼠受到攻击时,我们观察到突破裂殖体被炎症细胞浸润,主要是单核细胞和中性粒细胞;在攻击前这些小鼠体内CD4+或CD8+细胞的部分耗竭可防止突破裂殖体的浸润。因此,裂殖体的细胞浸润显然继发于淋巴细胞的早期作用。在用灭活子孢子免疫的小鼠中也未观察到这种浸润。减毒子孢子诱导的更有效的保护性免疫可能是由于它们能够将抗原释放到它们侵入的肝细胞的细胞质中,或者是由于它们能够继续分化,从而呈现出在用灭活子孢子免疫后看不到的新抗原。