Colombo Antonio, Moses Jeffrey W, Morice Marie Claude, Ludwig Josef, Holmes David R, Spanos Vassilis, Louvard Yves, Desmedt Benny, Di Mario Carlo, Leon Martin B
EMO Centro Cuore Columbus, Milan, Italy.
Circulation. 2004 Mar 16;109(10):1244-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000118474.71662.E3. Epub 2004 Feb 23.
A sirolimus-eluting stent (Cypher, Cordis Corp) has been reported to markedly decrease restenosis in selected lesions; higher-risk lesions, including coronary bifurcations, have not been studied.
This prospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions. Patients were randomly assigned to either stenting of both branches (group A) or stenting of the main branch with provisional stenting of the side branch (SB) (group B). Eighty-five patients (86 lesions) were enrolled. There was 1 case of unsuccessful delivery of any device at the bifurcation site. Given the high crossover, more lesions were treated with 2 stents (n=63) than with stent/balloon (n=22). Clinical follow-up at 6 months was completed in all patients and angiographic follow-up in 53 patients in group A (85.5%) and 21 in group B (95.4%). One patient died suddenly 4.5 months after the procedure. There were 3 cases of stent thrombosis (3.5%). The total restenosis rate at 6 months was 25.7%, and it was not significantly different between the double-stenting (28.0%) and the provisional SB-stenting (18.7%) groups. Fourteen of the restenosis cases occurred at the ostium of the SB and were focal. Target lesion revascularization was performed in 7 cases; target vessel failure occurred in 15 cases (17.6%).
These results are an improvement compared with historical controls using bare metal stents. Restenosis at the SB remains a problem. At this time, no statement can be made regarding the most appropriate technique to use when treating bifurcations with the Cypher stent.
据报道,西罗莫司洗脱支架(Cypher,科迪斯公司)可显著降低特定病变的再狭窄率;但包括冠状动脉分叉处在内的高风险病变尚未得到研究。
这项前瞻性研究评估了西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉分叉病变的安全性和有效性。患者被随机分为双分支支架置入组(A组)或主支支架置入及边支(SB)临时支架置入组(B组)。共纳入85例患者(86处病变)。有1例在分叉部位任何器械置入均未成功。鉴于交叉率较高,接受双支架治疗的病变(n = 63)多于接受支架/球囊治疗的病变(n = 22)。所有患者均完成了6个月的临床随访,A组53例患者(85.5%)和B组21例患者(95.4%)完成了血管造影随访。1例患者在术后4.5个月突然死亡。有3例支架血栓形成(3.5%)。6个月时的总再狭窄率为25.7%,双支架置入组(28.0%)和边支临时支架置入组(18.7%)之间无显著差异。14例再狭窄病例发生在边支开口处,且为局灶性。7例患者进行了靶病变血管重建;15例患者发生了靶血管失败(17.6%)。
与使用裸金属支架的历史对照相比,这些结果有所改善。边支再狭窄仍然是一个问题。目前,在用Cypher支架治疗分叉病变时,无法就最适宜的技术作出说明。