Toll样受体3介导的核因子κB和干扰素调节因子3的激活在含Toll-白细胞介素-1受体结构域的接头诱导干扰素-β处出现分歧。

Toll-like receptor 3-mediated activation of NF-kappaB and IRF3 diverges at Toll-IL-1 receptor domain-containing adapter inducing IFN-beta.

作者信息

Jiang Zhengfan, Mak Tak W, Sen Ganes, Li Xiaoxia

机构信息

University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Mar 9;101(10):3533-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308496101. Epub 2004 Feb 24.

Abstract

We have previously shown that double-stranded RNA-triggered, Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3)-mediated signaling is independent of MyD88, IRAK4, and IRAK. Instead, TRAF6, TAK1, and TAB2 are recruited to TLR3 on poly(I.C) stimulation. TRAF6-TAK1-TAB2 are then translocated to the cytosol where TAK1 is phosphorylated and activated, leading to the activation of IkappaB kinase and NFkappaB. The present study addressed two important questions: (i) How are TRAF6, TAK1, and TAB2 recruited to TLR3? (ii) Are TRAF6, TAK1, and TAB2 also required for TLR3-mediated IRF3 activation? Recently, a novel Toll-IL-1 receptor (TIR)-containing adapter, TIR domain-containing adapter inducing IFN-beta (TRIF), was shown to play a critical role in TLR3-mediated activation of NF-kappaB and IRF3. We found that TLR3 recruits TRAF6 via adapter TRIF through a TRAF6-binding sequence in TRIF (PEEMSW, amino acids 250-255). Mutation of this TRAF6-binding sequence abolished the interaction of TRIF with TRAF6, but not with TLR3. Interestingly, mutation of the TRAF6-binding site of TRIF only abolished its ability to activate NF-kappaB but not IRF3, suggesting that TLR3-mediated activation of NF-kappaB and IRF3 might bifurcate at TRIF. In support of this finding, we showed that DN-TRAF6 and DN-TAK1 blocked poly(I.C)-induced NF-kappaB but not IRF3 activation. Furthermore, whereas poly(I.C)-induced NF-kappaB activation is completely abolished inTRAF6-/- MEFs, the signal-induced activation of IRF3 is TRAF6 independent. In conclusion, TRIF recruits TRAF6-TAK1-TAB2 to TLR3 through its TRAF6-binding site, which is required for NF-kappaB but not IRF3 activation. Therefore, double-stranded RNA-induced TLR3/TRIF-mediated NF-kappaB and IRF3 activation diverge at TRIF.

摘要

我们之前已经表明,双链RNA触发的、Toll样受体3(TLR3)介导的信号传导不依赖于髓样分化因子88(MyD88)、白细胞介素-1受体相关激酶4(IRAK4)和白细胞介素-1受体相关激酶(IRAK)。相反,在聚肌胞苷酸(poly(I.C))刺激下,肿瘤坏死因子受体相关因子6(TRAF6)、转化生长因子β激活激酶1(TAK1)和TAK1结合蛋白2(TAB2)被招募至TLR3。随后,TRAF6-TAK1-TAB2转位至胞质溶胶,在那里TAK1被磷酸化并激活,从而导致核因子κB抑制蛋白激酶(IkappaB kinase)和核因子κB(NFkappaB)的激活。本研究探讨了两个重要问题:(i)TRAF6、TAK1和TAB2是如何被招募至TLR3的?(ii)TRAF6、TAK1和TAB2对于TLR3介导的干扰素调节因子3(IRF3)激活是否也是必需的?最近,一种新的含Toll-白细胞介素-1受体(TIR)的衔接蛋白,即含TIR结构域的衔接蛋白诱导干扰素-β(TRIF),被证明在TLR3介导的NF-κB和IRF3激活中起关键作用。我们发现,TLR3通过衔接蛋白TRIF,经由TRIF中的一个TRAF6结合序列(PEEMSW,第250 - 255位氨基酸)招募TRAF6。该TRAF6结合序列的突变消除了TRIF与TRAF6的相互作用,但未消除其与TLR3的相互作用。有趣的是,TRIF的TRAF6结合位点的突变仅消除了其激活NF-κB的能力,而未消除激活IRF3的能力,这表明TLR3介导的NF-κB和IRF激活可能在TRIF处发生分歧。为支持这一发现,我们表明,显性负性TRAF6(DN-TRAF6)和显性负性TAK1(DN-TAK1)阻断了poly(I.C)诱导的NF-κB激活,但未阻断IRF3激活。此外,虽然在TRAF6基因敲除(TRAF6-/-)的小鼠胚胎成纤维细胞(MEFs)中,poly(I.C)诱导的NF-κB激活被完全消除,但信号诱导的IRF3激活不依赖于TRAF6。总之,TRIF通过其TRAF6结合位点将TRAF6-TAK1-TAB2招募至TLR3,该位点是NF-κB激活所必需的,但不是IRF3激活所必需。因此,双链RNA诱导的TLR3/TRIF介导的NF-κB和IRF3激活在TRIF处发生分歧。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索