Krentz Andrew J
Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2003 Nov;5 Suppl 1:S19-27. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-8902.2003.0310.x.
Dyslipidaemia is common in patients with Type 2 diabetes and is held to be responsible for considerable CVD-related morbidity and mortality. Patients with Type 2 diabetes are at high risk from complications associated with atherosclerosis and should therefore receive preventive interventions. At the level of the adipocyte, impaired insulin action leads to increased rates of intracellular hydrolysis of triglycerides with the release of NEFA. The rise in NEFA provides substrate for the liver that, in the presence of impaired insulin action and relative insulin deficiency, is associated with complex alterations in plasma lipids: * Plasma VLDL levels are raised. (i). Increased VLDL levels are associated with post-prandial hyperlipidaemia that is compounded by impaired LPL activity. The latter may be independently associated with CAD. (ii). Remnant particles can deliver more cholesterol to macrophages than LDL-C particles. Thrombogenic alterations in the coagulation system also ensue from hypertriglyceridaemia. * Plasma HDL-C levels are reduced. (i). The reduction in cardioprotective HDL-C means a reduction of cholesterol efflux from the tissues--the first step in reverse cholesterol transport to the liver from peripheral tissues. (ii). The antioxidant and antiatherogenic activities of HDL-C are reduced when circulating levels are low. * LDL-C particles become small and dense. Small, dense LDL-C particles are held to be more atherogenic than their larger, buoyant counterparts because they (a) are more liable to oxidation and (b) may more readily adhere to and subsequently invade the arterial wall. The atherogenicity of LDL-C may also be enhanced by nonenzymatic glycation. Metabolic and lipid abnormalities can often be improved with lifestyle changes, including dietary modification, weight loss, smoking cessation and increased exercise. Although attainment of better glycaemic control may improve diabetic dyslipidaemia, pharmacological intervention is usually required. Several large-scale clinical trials, including 4S and more recently HPS, have clearly demonstrated the benefits of statins in reducing cardiovascular events. By virtue of their high absolute risk of CVD, many patients with Type 2 diabetes may achieve a greater risk reduction than their non-diabetic counterparts. For example, in 4S there was a 43% reduction in total mortality risk among patients with diabetes compared with 29% for non-diabetics and a reduced risk of MI by 55% vs. 32% for diabetic and non-diabetics, respectively. In the diabetic subgroup in HPS, there were reductions of approximately 25-30% in the risk of first major vascular events. More recently, the lipid-lowering arm of the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT) was halted early because of a significant reduction in cardiovascular events compared with placebo. Surprisingly an analysis of subgroups failed to show significance among the diabetic population, although the sample size, shortened follow-up period and higher drop-in statin use among diabetics on placebo may have affected results. The Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS), involving 2800 patients with Type 2 diabetes, was halted 2 years early in June 2003 because patients allocated atorvastatin had significant reductions in MI, stroke and surgical procedures compared with those receiving placebo. The UKPDS demonstrated that the appearance and progression of certain microvascular complications of Type 2 diabetes could be reduced by treatment directed at hyperglycaemia and hypertension. In addition, correction of dyslipidaemia in patients with diabetes is important in reducing the high toll from macrovascular disease. The subjects in the HPS had similar lipid profiles to the participants in UKPDS, suggesting that additional benefit would accrue from a therapeutic assault on the main cardiovascular risk factors simultaneously. We now have firm evidence that appropriate use of statins in patients with Type 2 diabetes can significantly reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
血脂异常在2型糖尿病患者中很常见,被认为是导致大量心血管疾病相关发病和死亡的原因。2型糖尿病患者面临与动脉粥样硬化相关并发症的高风险,因此应接受预防性干预。在脂肪细胞水平,胰岛素作用受损导致细胞内甘油三酯水解速率增加,释放出非酯化脂肪酸(NEFA)。NEFA的增加为肝脏提供了底物,在胰岛素作用受损和相对胰岛素缺乏的情况下,这与血浆脂质的复杂变化有关:
血浆极低密度脂蛋白(VLDL)水平升高。(i). VLDL水平升高与餐后高脂血症有关,脂蛋白脂肪酶(LPL)活性受损会使这种情况更加严重。后者可能与冠心病独立相关。(ii). 残留颗粒比低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)颗粒能向巨噬细胞输送更多胆固醇。高甘油三酯血症还会导致凝血系统的血栓形成改变。
血浆高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)水平降低。(i). 具有心脏保护作用的HDL-C减少意味着组织中胆固醇流出减少,这是胆固醇从外周组织逆向转运至肝脏的第一步。(ii). 当循环水平较低时,HDL-C的抗氧化和抗动脉粥样硬化活性会降低。
LDL-C颗粒变得小而致密。小而致密的LDL-C颗粒被认为比其较大、浮力较大的对应颗粒更具动脉粥样硬化性,因为它们(a)更容易氧化,(b)可能更容易粘附并随后侵入动脉壁。LDL-C的动脉粥样硬化性也可能因非酶糖基化而增强。代谢和脂质异常通常可以通过生活方式的改变得到改善,包括饮食调整、体重减轻、戒烟和增加运动。虽然更好地控制血糖可能会改善糖尿病血脂异常,但通常需要药物干预。包括4S试验以及最近的心脏保护研究(HPS)在内的几项大规模临床试验已经清楚地证明了他汀类药物在减少心血管事件方面的益处。由于2型糖尿病患者发生心血管疾病的绝对风险较高,许多此类患者可能比非糖尿病患者实现更大程度的风险降低。例如,在4S试验中,糖尿病患者的总死亡风险降低了43%,而非糖尿病患者为29%;糖尿病患者心肌梗死(MI)风险降低了55%,非糖尿病患者为32%。在HPS试验的糖尿病亚组中,首次重大血管事件的风险降低了约25 - 30%。最近,盎格鲁 - 斯堪的纳维亚心脏结局试验(ASCOT)的降脂组由于与安慰剂相比心血管事件显著减少而提前终止。令人惊讶的是,亚组分析在糖尿病人群中未显示出显著性,尽管样本量、缩短的随访期以及安慰剂组中糖尿病患者他汀类药物的较高使用率可能影响了结果。涉及2800名2型糖尿病患者的阿托伐他汀糖尿病协作研究(CARDS)于2003年6月提前2年终止,因为与接受安慰剂的患者相比,分配到阿托伐他汀组的患者在MI、中风和外科手术方面有显著减少。英国前瞻性糖尿病研究(UKPDS)表明,针对高血糖和高血压的治疗可以减少2型糖尿病某些微血管并发症的出现和进展。此外,纠正糖尿病患者的血脂异常对于降低大血管疾病的高昂代价很重要。HPS试验中的受试者与UKPDS试验的参与者具有相似的血脂谱,这表明同时对主要心血管危险因素进行治疗会带来额外益处。我们现在有确凿的证据表明,2型糖尿病患者合理使用他汀类药物可以显著降低心血管疾病的发病率和死亡率。