• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国和加拿大消化性溃疡出血患者急性处理中内镜治疗后大剂量静脉注射质子泵抑制剂的成本效益分析

High-dose intravenous proton pump inhibition following endoscopic therapy in the acute management of patients with bleeding peptic ulcers in the USA and Canada: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

作者信息

Barkun A N, Herba K, Adam V, Kennedy W, Fallone C A, Bardou M

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Mar 1;19(5):591-600. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2004.01808.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2036.2004.01808.x
PMID:14987328
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of high-dose intravenous proton pump inhibition has recently been shown, yet its cost-effectiveness remains poorly studied.

AIM

To assess the cost-effectiveness of this approach separately for American and Canadian health care settings.

METHODS

A validated decision model included patients with bleeding ulcers after successful endoscopic haemostasis. Probabilities were determined from the literature, and charges and lengths of stay from national databases. A third-party payer perspective was adopted over a 30-day time horizon.

RESULTS

Re-bleeding rates were 5.9% for patients who received high-dose intravenous proton pump inhibition and 22.9% for those who did not. Hospitalization costs for patients with and without re-bleeding were 11,802 US dollars and 7993 US dollars, and 5220 Canadian dollars and 2696 Canadian dollars, respectively. High-dose intravenous proton pump inhibition was more effective and less costly than the alternative of not administering it. The cost-effectiveness ratios for high-dose and no high-dose intravenous proton pump inhibition were 9112 US dollars and 11,819 US dollars (3293 dollars and 4284 dollars for the Canadian case), respectively. Sensitivity and threshold analyses showed that the results were robust across a wide range of clinically relevant assumptions.

CONCLUSION

In the USA and Canada, administering high-dose intravenous proton pump inhibition for 3 days is both more effective and less costly than not doing so for patients with bleeding ulcers after successful endoscopic haemostasis.

摘要

背景

高剂量静脉注射质子泵抑制剂的疗效最近已得到证实,但其成本效益仍研究不足。

目的

分别评估美国和加拿大医疗环境下这种治疗方法的成本效益。

方法

一个经过验证的决策模型纳入了内镜止血成功后发生出血性溃疡的患者。概率根据文献确定,费用和住院时间来自国家数据库。采用第三方支付者视角,时间跨度为30天。

结果

接受高剂量静脉注射质子泵抑制剂的患者再出血率为5.9%,未接受的患者为22.9%。有再出血和无再出血患者的住院费用分别为11,802美元和7993美元,以及5220加元和2696加元。高剂量静脉注射质子泵抑制剂比不使用该药物更有效且成本更低。高剂量和非高剂量静脉注射质子泵抑制剂的成本效益比分别为9112美元和11,819美元(加拿大情况为3293加元和4284加元)。敏感性和阈值分析表明,在广泛的临床相关假设下,结果是稳健的。

结论

在美国和加拿大,对于内镜止血成功后发生出血性溃疡的患者,给予3天高剂量静脉注射质子泵抑制剂比不给予更有效且成本更低。

相似文献

1
High-dose intravenous proton pump inhibition following endoscopic therapy in the acute management of patients with bleeding peptic ulcers in the USA and Canada: a cost-effectiveness analysis.美国和加拿大消化性溃疡出血患者急性处理中内镜治疗后大剂量静脉注射质子泵抑制剂的成本效益分析
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Mar 1;19(5):591-600. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2004.01808.x.
2
Cost effectiveness of high-dose intravenous esomeprazole for peptic ulcer bleeding.大剂量静脉注射埃索美拉唑治疗消化性溃疡出血的成本效果分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(3):217-30. doi: 10.2165/11531480-000000000-00000.
3
The cost-effectiveness of high-dose oral proton pump inhibition after endoscopy in the acute treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding.内镜检查后大剂量口服质子泵抑制剂在消化性溃疡出血急性治疗中的成本效益
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Jul 15;20(2):195-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02035.x.
4
Cost-effectiveness in Canada of intravenous proton pump inhibitors for all patients presenting with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.加拿大针对所有急性上消化道出血患者静脉注射质子泵抑制剂的成本效益分析
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Jan;17(2):225-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01412.x.
5
Cost implications of administering intravenous proton pump inhibitors to all patients presenting to the emergency department with peptic ulcer bleeding.对所有因消化性溃疡出血就诊于急诊科的患者静脉注射质子泵抑制剂的成本影响。
Value Health. 2003 Jul-Aug;6(4):457-65. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2003.64262.x.
6
The cost-effectiveness and budget impact of intravenous versus oral proton pump inhibitors in peptic ulcer hemorrhage.静脉注射与口服质子泵抑制剂治疗消化性溃疡出血的成本效益及预算影响
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Aug;4(8):988-997. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.05.019. Epub 2006 Jul 17.
7
Cost-effectiveness of proton-pump inhibition before endoscopy in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.上消化道出血内镜检查前质子泵抑制的成本效益
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Apr;6(4):418-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.12.037. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
8
Cost-effectiveness of proton pump inhibitor therapy for acute peptic ulcer-related bleeding.
Crit Care Med. 2004 Jun;32(6):1277-83. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000127261.09066.6e.
9
Endoscopic Doppler ultrasound versus endoscopic stigmata-directed management of acute peptic ulcer hemorrhage: a multimodel cost analysis.内镜多普勒超声与急性消化性溃疡出血的内镜下病变特征导向管理:多模型成本分析
Dig Dis Sci. 2007 Jan;52(1):149-60. doi: 10.1007/s10620-006-9506-5. Epub 2006 Nov 16.
10
Oral versus intravenous proton pump inhibitors in preventing re-bleeding for patients with peptic ulcer bleeding after successful endoscopic therapy.口服与静脉质子泵抑制剂预防内镜治疗成功后的消化性溃疡出血患者再出血。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2012 Jun 8;12:66. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-66.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of high-dose versus low-dose proton pump inhibitors for treatment of gastrointestinal ulcer bleeding: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.大剂量与低剂量质子泵抑制剂治疗胃肠道溃疡出血的效果:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Apr;50(4):3000605211067396. doi: 10.1177/03000605211067396.
2
Efficacy Comparison of Divided and Infusion Intravenous Pantoprazole Methods after Endoscopic Therapy in Patients with Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding.急性胃肠道出血患者内镜治疗后泮托拉唑静脉分次给药与持续输注给药方法的疗效比较
Adv Biomed Res. 2017 Sep 21;6:120. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_59_16. eCollection 2017.
3
Reassessment of Rebleeding Risk of Forrest IB (Oozing) Peptic Ulcer Bleeding in a Large International Randomized Trial.
一项大型国际随机试验中对福里斯特IB级(渗血)消化性溃疡出血再出血风险的重新评估
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar;112(3):441-446. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.582. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
4
Editorial: Intravenous Proton Pump Inhibitors for Bleeding Peptic Ulcer: What is the Most Cost-Effective Approach?社论:用于出血性消化性溃疡的静脉质子泵抑制剂:最具成本效益的方法是什么?
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct;111(10):1399-1401. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.350.
5
Timing or Dosing of Intravenous Proton Pump Inhibitors in Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Has Low Impact on Costs.急性上消化道出血时静脉注射质子泵抑制剂的给药时间或剂量对成本影响较小。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct;111(10):1389-1398. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.157. Epub 2016 May 3.
6
Diagnosis and therapy of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的诊断与治疗
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Nov 6;6(4):172-82. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v6.i4.172.
7
Doppler endoscopic probe as a guide to risk stratification and definitive hemostasis of peptic ulcer bleeding.多普勒内镜探头作为消化性溃疡出血风险分层及确切止血的指导工具。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jan;83(1):129-36. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
8
Partially covered self-expandable metal stents versus polyethylene stents for malignant biliary obstruction: a cost-effectiveness analysis.部分覆膜自膨式金属支架与聚乙烯支架治疗恶性胆管梗阻的成本效益分析
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Oct;29(7):377-83. doi: 10.1155/2015/743417. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
9
Pantoprazole for the treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding and prevention of rebleeding.泮托拉唑用于治疗消化性溃疡出血及预防再出血。
Clin Med Insights Gastroenterol. 2012 Sep 17;5:51-60. doi: 10.4137/CGast.S9893. eCollection 2012.
10
Management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的管理
Clin Endosc. 2012 Sep;45(3):220-3. doi: 10.5946/ce.2012.45.3.220. Epub 2012 Aug 22.