Maquet Didier, Croisier Jean-Louis, Demoulin Christophe, Crielaard Jean-Michel
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Eur J Pain. 2004 Apr;8(2):111-7. doi: 10.1016/S1090-3801(03)00082-X.
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) is defined as the minimum force applied which induces pain. This measure has proven to be commonly useful in evaluating tenderness symptom. Our aim was to study the intra-examiner reproducibility of PPT measurement, define cutoffs in normal groups, and compare these results with patients with fibromyalgia (FM). Fifty healthy females, 50 healthy males, and 20 patients with FM participated in the study. PPTs were assessed for 18 specific tender point sites by a dolorimeter. The intra-individual coefficient of variation determined by a test-retest PPT measurement procedure with 3-days interval reached, respectively, 17% and 13% in healthy females and males, versus 24% in patients with FM. PPTs were significantly lower in healthy females than in healthy males (p<0.01). Statistical analysis failed to show any differences between the dominant and nondominant side for both normal groups. PPTs were lower over all examined areas in patients with FM than those obtained in healthy females (p<0.000). Lower cutoff levels were calculated from normal values for all specific tender point sites. On average, 14 tender point sites in patients with FM were under the established lower cutoffs. In conclusion, pressure pain sensitivity was influenced by the anatomical localization of tender point and gender differences. Lowest PPTs were localized in trapezius, occiput, anterior cervical, and second rib. The reduction of total tender point score in patients with FM averaged 60% comparatively with normal values. PPT reproducibility and discrimination between the two groups were optimal for the gluteal and knee sites.
压痛阈(PPT)被定义为引起疼痛所需施加的最小力。已证明该测量方法在评估压痛症状方面通常很有用。我们的目的是研究PPT测量的检查者内重复性,确定正常组的临界值,并将这些结果与纤维肌痛(FM)患者进行比较。50名健康女性、50名健康男性和20名FM患者参与了该研究。使用压痛计评估18个特定压痛点部位的PPT。通过间隔3天的重测PPT测量程序确定的个体内变异系数在健康女性和男性中分别达到17%和13%,而FM患者为24%。健康女性的PPT显著低于健康男性(p<0.01)。统计分析未显示两个正常组的优势侧和非优势侧之间有任何差异。FM患者所有检查区域的PPT均低于健康女性(p<0.000)。根据所有特定压痛点部位的正常值计算出较低的临界水平。平均而言,FM患者有14个压痛点部位低于既定的较低临界值。总之,压痛敏感性受压痛点的解剖定位和性别差异影响。最低的PPT位于斜方肌、枕部、颈前部和第二肋。与正常值相比,FM患者的总压痛点评分平均降低了60%。PPT的重复性以及两组之间的区分度在臀肌和膝部部位最佳。