Chan Benjamin T B, Willett Janice
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Suite G-106, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Mar;103(3):493-8. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000113616.49207.dd.
To examine factors affecting participation in obstetrics among obstetrician-gynecologists and changes in participation over time.
Using physician billings from Ontario, Canada, from 1992/1993 to 2001/2002, we examined the impact of physician age, gender, practice location, and years of practice on participation in obstetrics with multiple logistic regression and repeated measures analyses. We also examined differences in practice patterns between obstetrics providers and nonproviders using linear and log-linear regressions.
Obstetrics participation declined with age, from 96% among physicians under age 35, to 34% among those aged 65 and over (2001/2002 figures). Regressions demonstrated a lower likelihood of performing obstetrics in successive years (odds ratio [OR] 0.95 per year; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93, 0.98) and among physicians who were older (OR 0.91 per year of age; 95% CI 0.90, 0.93), female (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.36, 0.91), and practicing in cities with medical schools (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.44, 0.78). The crude obstetrics participation rate dropped from 82% to 77%, from 1992/1993 to 2001/2002. The physician age-sex-adjusted participation rate dropped from 80% in 1992/1993 to 77% in 2001/2002. Obstetrics providers had almost double the annual billings of nonproviders ($364,000 verus $187,000; P <.001), but more on-call days worked (105 versus 13; P <.001). Nonproviders of obstetrics derived more of their billings from outpatient visits, psychotherapy, and diagnostic tests. The likelihood of an obstetrics nonprovider resuming obstetrics was 1.1% per year.
The proportion of obstetrician-gynecologists practicing obstetrics declined modestly in the last decade, partly because of more female physicians in the workforce who were less likely to practice obstetrics. Planners should consider these trends when estimating how many obstetrician-gynecologists to train to meet future societal needs.
II-2
探讨影响妇产科医生参与产科工作的因素以及参与度随时间的变化。
利用加拿大安大略省1992/1993年至2001/2002年的医生账单数据,我们通过多重逻辑回归和重复测量分析,研究了医生年龄、性别、执业地点和执业年限对参与产科工作的影响。我们还使用线性和对数线性回归分析了产科服务提供者与非提供者之间的执业模式差异。
产科参与度随年龄下降,35岁以下医生的参与率为96%,65岁及以上医生的参与率为34%(2001/2002年数据)。回归分析表明,连续几年进行产科工作的可能性较低(每年比值比[OR]为0.95;95%置信区间[CI]为0.93,0.98),年龄较大的医生(每年年龄的OR为0.91;95%CI为0.90,0.93)、女性医生(OR为0.57;95%CI为0.36,0.91)以及在有医学院的城市执业的医生(OR为0.58;95%CI为0.44,0.78)进行产科工作的可能性也较低。从1992/1993年到2001/2002年,产科参与率的粗略估计值从82%降至77%。经医生年龄和性别调整后的参与率从1992/1993年的80%降至2001/2002年的77%。产科服务提供者的年账单几乎是非提供者的两倍(36.4万美元对18.7万美元;P<.001),但值班天数更多(105天对13天;P<.001)。非产科服务提供者的账单更多来自门诊、心理治疗和诊断测试。非产科服务提供者恢复产科工作的可能性为每年1.1%。
在过去十年中,从事产科工作的妇产科医生比例略有下降,部分原因是劳动力中女性医生增多,她们从事产科工作的可能性较小。规划者在估计需要培训多少妇产科医生以满足未来社会需求时应考虑这些趋势。
II-2