Benedetti Thomas J, Baldwin Laura-Mae, Andrilla C Holly A, Hart L Gary
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Box 356460, Seattle, WA 98195-6460, USA.
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Mar;103(3):499-505. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000113617.94134.fd.
To compare the practice productivity of female and male obstetrician-gynecologists in Washington State.
The primary data collection tool was a practice survey that accompanied each licensed practitioner's license renewal in 1998-1999. Washington State birth certificate data were linked with the licensure data to obtain objective information regarding obstetric births.
Of the 541 obstetrician-gynecologists identified, two thirds were men and one third were women. Women were significantly younger than men (mean age 43.3 years versus 51.7 years). Ten practice variables were evaluated: total weeks worked per year, total professional hours per week, direct patient care hours per week, nondirect patient care hours per week, outpatient visits per week, inpatient visits per week, percent practicing obstetrics, number of obstetrical deliveries per year, percentage working less than 32 hours per week, and percentage working 60 or more hours per week. Of these, only 2 variables showed significant differences: inpatient visits per week (women 10.1 per week, men 12.8 per week, P < or =.01) and working 60 or more hours per week (women 22.1% versus men 31.5%, P < or =.05). After controlling for age, analysis of covariance and multiple logistic regression confirmed these findings and in addition showed that women worked 4.1 fewer hours per week than men (P <.01). When examining the ratio of female-to-male practice productivity in 10-year age increments from the 30-39 through the 50-59 age groups, a pattern emerged suggesting lower productivity in many variables in the women in the 40-49 age group.
Only small differences in practice productivity between men and women were demonstrated in a survey of nearly all obstetrician-gynecologists in Washington State. Changing demographics and behaviors of the obstetrician-gynecologist workforce will require ongoing longitudinal studies to confirm these findings and determine whether they are generalizable to the rest of the United States.
II-3
比较华盛顿州妇产科男医生和女医生的执业效率。
主要数据收集工具是一项在1998 - 1999年随每位持牌从业者执照续签一同进行的执业情况调查。华盛顿州出生证明数据与执照数据相链接,以获取有关产科分娩的客观信息。
在确定的541名妇产科医生中,三分之二是男性,三分之一是女性。女性明显比男性年轻(平均年龄43.3岁对51.7岁)。评估了10个执业变量:每年工作总周数、每周专业总时长、每周直接护理患者时长、每周非直接护理患者时长、每周门诊就诊次数、每周住院就诊次数、从事产科工作的百分比、每年产科分娩次数、每周工作少于32小时的百分比以及每周工作60小时或以上的百分比。其中,只有2个变量显示出显著差异:每周住院就诊次数(女性每周10.1次,男性每周12.8次,P≤0.01)和每周工作60小时或以上(女性22.1%对男性31.5%,P≤0.05)。在控制年龄后,协方差分析和多元逻辑回归证实了这些发现,此外还表明女性每周工作时长比男性少4.1小时(P<0.01)。当以10岁年龄增量考察30 - 39岁至50 - 59岁年龄组中女性与男性执业效率的比率时,出现了一种模式,表明40 - 49岁年龄组女性在许多变量上的效率较低。
在对华盛顿州几乎所有妇产科医生的一项调查中,男女执业效率仅显示出微小差异。妇产科医生劳动力不断变化的人口统计学特征和行为需要持续的纵向研究来证实这些发现,并确定它们是否适用于美国其他地区。
II - 3