Chan B, Anderson G M, Thériault M E
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Ontario, Toronto.
CMAJ. 1998 Mar 24;158(6):741-6.
To better understand the reasons why some fee-for-service physicians have high billing levels, the authors compared the practice and demographic characteristics of general practitioners and family physicians (GP/FPs) who submitted over $400,000 in annual Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) fee-for-service claims in 1994-95 with those of GP/FPs who billed between $35,000 and $400,000.
The authors describe the OHIP billing and physician characteristic data for fiscal year 1994-95. They used multivariate logistic regression to determine factors independently associated with high billing status.
A total of 219 GP/FPs (2.5% of the GP/FPs in Ontario) billed over $400,000 in 1994-95. Of these, 14 had billing patterns similar to those of specialists, and 27 billed predominantly for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures (particularly physiotherapy). The remaining 178 (81.3%) billed for a mix of services similar to that of other GP/FPs but on average had 2.6 times the volume of patient assessments and a greater share of their total billings derived from diagnostic and therapeutic procedures (9.1% v. 5.6%). Multivariate analysis indicated that these high-volume GP/FPs were less likely than GP/FPs who billed between $35,000 and $400,000 to be 60 years of age or older (odds ratio [OR] 0.09, p < 0.05) and female (OR 0.21) and were more likely to be foreign graduates (OR 1.85) and practising in a region with low physician supply (OR 0.45 for each increase of 1 physician per 1000 population). Metropolitan Toronto was an outlier to the latter relation and was more likely to have high-volume GP/FPs (OR 16.89).
High-billing GP/FPs attained their high billing levels by maintaining large numbers of patient visits and by performing procedures. Further research is needed to determine the time spent per patient and the quality of care delivered by these physicians as well as the appropriateness of the procedures that they perform.
为了更好地理解一些按服务收费的医生账单金额较高的原因,作者比较了1994 - 1995年安大略省医疗保险计划(OHIP)年度按服务收费索赔超过40万加元的全科医生和家庭医生(GP/FPs)与账单金额在3.5万至40万加元之间的GP/FPs的执业情况和人口统计学特征。
作者描述了1994 - 1995财政年度的OHIP账单和医生特征数据。他们使用多变量逻辑回归来确定与高账单状态独立相关的因素。
1994 - 1995年共有219名GP/FPs(占安大略省GP/FPs的2.5%)账单金额超过40万加元。其中,14人的账单模式与专科医生相似,27人主要开具诊断和治疗程序(特别是物理治疗)的账单。其余178人(81.3%)开具的服务组合与其他GP/FPs相似,但平均患者评估量是其2.6倍,且其总账单中诊断和治疗程序所占份额更大(9.1%对5.6%)。多变量分析表明,这些高诊疗量的GP/FPs与账单金额在3.5万至40万加元之间的GP/FPs相比,60岁及以上的可能性较小(优势比[OR]0.09,p < 0.05),女性的可能性较小(OR 0.21),外国毕业生的可能性较大(OR 1.85),且在医生供应低的地区执业的可能性较大(每增加1名医生/每1000人口,OR 0.45)。大多伦多地区与后一种关系不符,更有可能有高诊疗量的GP/FPs(OR 16.89)。
高账单金额的GP/FPs通过保持大量患者就诊和进行程序来达到高账单水平。需要进一步研究以确定这些医生每位患者花费的时间、提供的护理质量以及他们所进行程序的适当性。