Beckmann Ursula, Gillies Donna M, Berenholtz Sean M, Wu Albert W, Pronovost Peter
Division of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, John Hunter Hospital, Locked Bag 1, Newcastle Regional Mail Centre, 2300, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Aug;30(8):1579-85. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2177-9. Epub 2004 Feb 26.
Transportation of critically ill patients within the hospital poses important risks. We sought to identify causes, outcomes and contributing factors associated with intra-hospital transport.
Cross-sectional case review.
Incident reports submitted to the Australian Incident Monitoring Study in Intensive Care (AIMS-ICU).
Between 1993 and 1999, 176 reports were submitted describing 191 incidents. Seventy-five reports (39%) identified equipment problems, relating prominently to battery/power supply, transport ventilator and monitor function, access to patient elevators and intubation equipment. Hundred sixteen reports (61%) identified patient/staff management issues including poor communication, inadequate monitoring, incorrect set-up of equipment, artificial airway malpositioning and incorrect positioning of patients. Serious adverse outcomes occurred in 55 reports (31%) including major physiological derangement (15%), patient/relative dissatisfaction (7%), prolonged hospital stay (4%), physical/psychological injury (3%) and death (2%). Of 900 contributing factors identified, 46% were system-based and 54% human-based. Communication problems, inadequate protocols, in-servicing/training and equipment were prominent equipment-related incidents. Errors of problem recognition and judgement, failure to follow protocols, inadequate patient preparation, haste and inattention were common management-related incidents. Rechecking the patient and equipment, skilled assistance and prior experience were important factors limiting harm.
Intra-hospital transport poses an important risk to ICU patients. The adequate provision of highly qualified staff, specially designed and well maintained equipment, as well as continuous monitoring are essential to avoid/mitigate these incidents. Professional societies and local units should adopt guidelines/protocols for intra-hospital transportation. Monitoring of incidents should aid in the continuous improvement in patient safety.
在医院内转运重症患者存在重大风险。我们试图确定与院内转运相关的原因、结果及促成因素。
横断面病例回顾。
提交给澳大利亚重症监护事件监测研究(AIMS-ICU)的事件报告。
1993年至1999年间,提交了176份报告,描述了191起事件。75份报告(39%)指出了设备问题,主要涉及电池/电源、转运呼吸机和监测功能、使用患者电梯及插管设备。116份报告(61%)指出了患者/医护人员管理问题,包括沟通不畅、监测不足、设备设置错误、人工气道位置不当及患者体位不正确。55份报告(31%)出现了严重不良后果,包括严重生理紊乱(15%)、患者/家属不满(7%)、住院时间延长(4%)、身体/心理伤害(3%)及死亡(2%)。在确定的900个促成因素中,46%基于系统,54%基于人为。沟通问题、协议不完善、在职培训/培训及设备是突出的与设备相关的事件。问题识别和判断错误、未遵循协议、患者准备不足、匆忙及疏忽是常见的与管理相关的事件。重新检查患者和设备、熟练的协助及既往经验是限制伤害的重要因素。
院内转运对重症监护病房患者构成重大风险。提供足够的高素质工作人员、专门设计且维护良好的设备以及持续监测对于避免/减轻这些事件至关重要。专业协会和当地单位应采用院内转运的指南/协议。对事件的监测应有助于持续提高患者安全。