Chen Chien-Chung, Foley John M
Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan.
Vision Res. 2004 Apr;44(9):915-24. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.017.
Target threshold vs. pedestal contrast (TvC) functions for a vertical and a concentric target were measured on a vertical, a horizontal, a plaid or a concentric Gabor pedestal. All patterns had Guassian envelopes. All except one of the TvC functions had a dipper shape, that is, the target threshold first decreased and then increased with the pedestal contrast. The TvC function for a vertical target on a horizontal pedestal was monotonically increasing. A divisive inhibition model with two orientation selective mechanisms, sensitive to vertical and horizontal, fits the data reasonably well. A significant improvement in fit is obtained by adding one or two more mechanisms. These additional mechanisms are different for different observers. Some are consistent with oblique receptive fields, some with concentric receptive fields, and some are indeterminate.
在垂直、水平、格子或同心高斯包络的加博尔背景上,测量了垂直目标和同心目标的目标阈值与背景对比度(TvC)函数。除了一个TvC函数外,其他所有函数都呈勺状,即目标阈值先随背景对比度降低,然后升高。水平背景上垂直目标的TvC函数单调增加。一个具有对垂直和水平敏感的两个方向选择机制的分离抑制模型能较好地拟合数据。通过增加一个或两个以上机制,拟合有显著改善。这些额外的机制因观察者而异。有些与倾斜感受野一致,有些与同心感受野一致,有些则不确定。