• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用含枸橼酸-牛磺罗定的封管溶液预防透析导管相关败血症。

Prevention of dialysis catheter-related sepsis with a citrate-taurolidine-containing lock solution.

作者信息

Betjes Michiel G H, van Agteren Madelon

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Erasmus Medical Center, Dijkzigt Rotterdam, Dr Molewater plein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004 Jun;19(6):1546-51. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh014. Epub 2004 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfh014
PMID:14993498
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of haemodialysis catheters is complicated by catheter-related sepsis. Intraluminal colonization of the catheter with bacteria is important in the pathogenesis of catheter-related sepsis. The use of a catheter lock solution containing the antimicrobial taurolidine might prevent bacterial colonization, thereby reducing the incidence of catheter-related sepsis.

METHODS

In a randomized prospective trial, patients receiving a dialysis catheter were included and catheters were locked with either heparin or a citrate-taurolidine-containing solution. Blood cultures drawn from the catheter lumen were routinely taken every 2 weeks and at time of removal of the catheter to detect bacterial colonization. Catheter-related sepsis and exit-site infections were registered for both groups.

RESULTS

A total of 76 catheters were inserted in 58 patients. The incidence of catheter colonization progressed slowly over time with no differences between dialysis catheters filled with heparin or citrate-taurolidine-containing solution. The number of exit-site infections was also similar between both groups. In the heparin group, four cases of catheter-related sepsis occurred as opposed to no sepsis episodes in the patients with catheters locked with the citrate-taurolidine-containing solution (P<0.5). No side effects with the use of citrate-taurolidine catheter lock solution were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that catheter filling with a solution containing the antimicrobial taurolidine may significantly reduce the incidence of catheter-related sepsis. Taurolidine appears to be effective and safe and does not carry the risk for side effects that have been reported for other antimicrobial lock solutions containing gentamicin or high concentrations of citrate.

摘要

背景

血液透析导管的使用因导管相关败血症而变得复杂。导管腔内细菌定植在导管相关败血症的发病机制中很重要。使用含有抗菌剂牛磺罗定的导管封管溶液可能会防止细菌定植,从而降低导管相关败血症的发生率。

方法

在一项随机前瞻性试验中,纳入接受透析导管的患者,并分别用肝素或含枸橼酸盐 - 牛磺罗定的溶液封管。每2周常规从导管腔内采集血培养样本,并在拔除导管时采集,以检测细菌定植情况。记录两组的导管相关败血症和出口部位感染情况。

结果

共58例患者插入了76根导管。随着时间推移,导管定植发生率缓慢上升,用肝素封管的透析导管与用含枸橼酸盐 - 牛磺罗定溶液封管的透析导管之间无差异。两组出口部位感染数量也相似。肝素组发生了4例导管相关败血症,而用含枸橼酸盐 - 牛磺罗定溶液封管的患者未发生败血症(P<0.5)。未观察到使用含枸橼酸盐 - 牛磺罗定导管封管溶液的副作用。

结论

本研究表明,用含有抗菌剂牛磺罗定的溶液封管可显著降低导管相关败血症的发生率。牛磺罗定似乎有效且安全,不存在已报道的含庆大霉素或高浓度枸橼酸盐的其他抗菌封管溶液的副作用风险。

相似文献

1
Prevention of dialysis catheter-related sepsis with a citrate-taurolidine-containing lock solution.使用含枸橼酸-牛磺罗定的封管溶液预防透析导管相关败血症。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004 Jun;19(6):1546-51. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh014. Epub 2004 Feb 19.
2
Randomized controlled trial of taurolidine citrate versus heparin as catheter lock solution in paediatric patients with haematological malignancies.柠檬酸牛磺菌素与肝素在儿童血液恶性肿瘤患者中作为导管封管液的随机对照试验。
J Hosp Infect. 2012 Apr;80(4):304-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Feb 18.
3
A new haemodialysis catheter-locking agent reduces infections in haemodialysis patients.
J Ren Care. 2008 Sep;34(3):116-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6686.2008.00027.x.
4
Taurolidine-citrate-heparin catheter lock solution reduces staphylococcal bacteraemia rates in haemodialysis patients.枸橼酸柠檬酸肝素钙封管液降低血液透析患者葡萄球菌菌血症发生率。
QJM. 2014 Dec;107(12):995-1000. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcu128. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
5
A randomized double-blind controlled trial of taurolidine-citrate catheter locks for the prevention of bacteremia in patients treated with hemodialysis.一项随机双盲对照试验,评估牛磺罗定-柠檬酸盐导管封管液在预防血液透析患者菌血症中的作用。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Jun;55(6):1060-8. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.11.025. Epub 2010 Mar 6.
6
A Taurolidine-Citrate-Heparin Lock Solution Effectively Eradicates Pathogens From the Catheter Biofilm in Hemodialysis Patients.一种牛磺罗定 - 柠檬酸盐 - 肝素封管溶液可有效清除血液透析患者导管生物膜中的病原体。
Am J Ther. 2016 Mar-Apr;23(2):e363-8. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e31828d4610.
7
Administration of taurolidine-citrate lock solution for prevention of central venous catheter infection in adult neutropenic haematological patients: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (TAURCAT).使用牛磺罗定 - 柠檬酸盐封管溶液预防成年中性粒细胞减少血液学患者中心静脉导管感染:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验(TAURCAT)
Trials. 2018 May 2;19(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2647-y.
8
Biofilm formation in long-term central venous catheters in children with cancer: a randomized controlled open-labelled trial of taurolidine versus heparin.癌症患儿长期中心静脉导管中生物膜的形成:替考拉宁与肝素的随机对照开放标签试验。
APMIS. 2012 Oct;120(10):794-801. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2012.02910.x. Epub 2012 May 15.
9
Taurolidine-based catheter lock regimen significantly reduces overall costs, infection, and dysfunction rates of tunneled hemodialysis catheters.基于牛磺罗定的导管封管方案可显著降低隧道式血液透析导管的总费用、感染率和功能障碍发生率。
Kidney Int. 2018 Mar;93(3):753-760. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.06.026. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
10
Impact of locking solutions on conditioning biofilm formation in tunnelled haemodialysis catheters and inflammatory response activation.锁定解决方案对隧道式血液透析导管中条件生物膜形成和炎症反应激活的影响。
J Vasc Access. 2021 May;22(3):370-379. doi: 10.1177/1129729820942040. Epub 2020 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Citrate as a safe and effective alternative to heparin for catheter locking: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.柠檬酸盐作为肝素用于导管封管的安全有效替代方法:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 26;12:1530619. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1530619. eCollection 2025.
2
Antimicrobial Lock Therapy in Clinical Practice: A Scoping Review.临床实践中的抗菌封管疗法:一项范围综述
Microorganisms. 2025 Feb 13;13(2):406. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13020406.
3
Comparison of the effect of heparin, reteplase, and taurolock in the prevention of thrombosis in hemodialysis catheters.
肝素、瑞替普酶和牛磺罗定在预防血液透析导管血栓形成中的效果比较。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 May 9;7(5):e2057. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2057. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Reevaluation of lock solutions for Central venous catheters in hemodialysis: a narrative review.血液透析中中心静脉导管固定方案的再评估:叙述性综述。
Ren Fail. 2022 Dec;44(1):1501-1518. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2118068.
5
Heparin versus 0.9% sodium chloride locking for prevention of occlusion in central venous catheters in adults.肝素与 0.9%氯化钠封管预防成人中心静脉导管阻塞的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 18;7(7):CD008462. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008462.pub4.
6
Taurolidine Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Lock to Treat Relapsing Peritoneal Dialysis Peritonitis.用牛磺罗定腹膜透析导管封管治疗复发性腹膜透析腹膜炎。
Kidney Med. 2020 Jul 13;2(5):650-651. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2020.04.012. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.
7
Taurolidine lock solution for catheter-related bloodstream infections in pediatric patients: A meta-analysis.替考拉宁封管液在小儿患者导管相关血流感染中的应用:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 7;15(4):e0231110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231110. eCollection 2020.
8
Citrate versus heparin lock for prevention of hemodialysis catheter-related complications: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.柠檬酸盐与肝素封管预防血液透析导管相关并发症的比较:更新的随机对照试验系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Jun;51(6):1019-1033. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02150-0. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
9
Re-Evaluating the Protective Effect of Hemodialysis Catheter Locking Solutions in Hemodialysis Patients.重新评估血液透析导管封管溶液对血液透析患者的保护作用。
J Clin Med. 2019 Mar 25;8(3):412. doi: 10.3390/jcm8030412.
10
Diagnosis, prevention and treatment of haemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI): a position statement of European Renal Best Practice (ERBP).血液透析导管相关血流感染(CRBSI)的诊断、预防和治疗:欧洲肾脏最佳实践(ERBP)立场声明
NDT Plus. 2010 Jun;3(3):234-246. doi: 10.1093/ndtplus/sfq041.