Mardle Simon, Pascoe Sean, Herrero Inés
Centre for the Economics and Management of Aquatic Resources (CEMARE), University of Portsmouth, Locksway Road, Portsmouth PO4 8JF, UK.
Environ Manage. 2004 Jan;33(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s00267-003-3070-y. Epub 2004 Feb 24.
In determining the importance of criteria in the management of fisheries, two key issues stand out-the definition of a succinct set of criteria and the determination of which interest groups play a defining role in the management development process. This is indeed the case for all natural resource management problems, and many other environmental problems as well. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) provides an effective framework for such an analysis. The AHP is generally used to evaluate importance amongst criteria based on the concept of paired comparison. This paper considers the development of a representative criteria hierarchy, and uses data obtained from a pairwise comparison survey based on the UK fisheries of the English Channel to investigate priorities that exist among different interest groups in the fisheries. The implementation of the AHP in this application provides a useful tool for analysis of criteria amongst groups involved in the management process with diverse interests.
在确定渔业管理标准的重要性时,有两个关键问题尤为突出——定义一套简洁的标准以及确定哪些利益集团在管理发展过程中发挥决定性作用。所有自然资源管理问题以及许多其他环境问题确实都是如此。层次分析法(AHP)为这种分析提供了一个有效的框架。层次分析法通常用于基于成对比较的概念评估标准之间的重要性。本文考虑构建一个具有代表性的标准层次结构,并使用从基于英吉利海峡英国渔业的成对比较调查中获得的数据,来研究渔业中不同利益集团之间存在的优先事项。层次分析法在本应用中的实施为分析参与管理过程且利益多样的各集团之间的标准提供了一个有用的工具。