• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将社区目标纳入湿地管理改善:层次分析法的应用

Incorporating community objectives in improved wetland management: the use of the analytic hierarchy process.

作者信息

Herath Gamini

机构信息

School of Business, La Trobe University, Albury/Wodonga Campus, Wodonga, Vic. 3690, Australia.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2004 Mar;70(3):263-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.12.011.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.12.011
PMID:15036698
Abstract

Wetlands in Australia provide considerable ecological, economic, environmental and social benefits. However, the use of wetlands has been indiscriminate and significant damage to many Australian wetlands has occurred. During the last 150 years one third of the wetlands in Victoria have been lost. A conspicuous problem in wetland management is the paucity of involvement by stakeholders. This paper uses the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to incorporate stakeholder objectives in the 'Wonga Wetlands' on the Murray River. The study shows that the AHP can explicitly incorporate stakeholder preferences and multiple objectives to evaluate management options. The AHP also provides several approaches for policy makers to arrive at policy decisions.

摘要

澳大利亚的湿地带来了可观的生态、经济、环境和社会效益。然而,湿地的利用一直缺乏规划,许多澳大利亚湿地遭到了严重破坏。在过去的150年里,维多利亚州三分之一的湿地已经消失。湿地管理中一个明显的问题是利益相关者的参与度不足。本文运用层次分析法(AHP)将利益相关者的目标纳入墨累河上的“旺加湿地”管理中。研究表明,层次分析法能够明确纳入利益相关者的偏好和多个目标,以评估管理方案。层次分析法还为政策制定者提供了几种做出政策决策的方法。

相似文献

1
Incorporating community objectives in improved wetland management: the use of the analytic hierarchy process.将社区目标纳入湿地管理改善:层次分析法的应用
J Environ Manage. 2004 Mar;70(3):263-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.12.011.
2
Stakeholder preferences towards conservation versus development for a wetland in Sri Lanka.利益相关者对斯里兰卡某湿地保护与开发的偏好。
J Environ Manage. 2005 Oct;77(2):122-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.03.006.
3
Barmah-Millewa forest environmental water allocation.巴尔马-米利瓦森林环境用水分配
Water Sci Technol. 2002;45(11):217-23.
4
An introduction of co-management approach into Babon River management in Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia.印度尼西亚中爪哇省三宝垄市将共同管理方法引入巴本河管理的介绍。
Water Sci Technol. 2003;48(7):173-80.
5
Applying local knowledge: the contribution of oral history to wetland rehabilitation at Kanyapella Basin, Australia.应用地方知识:口述历史对澳大利亚坎亚佩拉盆地湿地恢复的贡献。
J Environ Manage. 2003 Nov;69(3):275-87. doi: 10.1016/s0301-4797(03)00155-5.
6
Implementing participatory decision making in forest planning.在森林规划中实施参与式决策。
Environ Manage. 2007 Apr;39(4):534-44. doi: 10.1007/s00267-006-0031-2. Epub 2007 Feb 1.
7
Quantifying ecosystem service trade-offs: the case of an urban floodplain in Vienna, Austria.量化生态系统服务权衡:以奥地利维也纳城市洪泛区为例。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Nov 30;111:159-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.008. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
8
Integrated wetland management: an analysis with group model building based on system dynamics model.综合湿地管理:基于系统动力学模型的群组模型构建分析
J Environ Manage. 2014 Dec 15;146:309-319. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.038. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
9
Environmental flows and water quality objectives for the River Murray.墨累河的环境流量与水质目标
Water Sci Technol. 2002;45(11):251-60.
10
Local social capital and the acceptance of Protected Area policies: an empirical study of two Ramsar river delta ecosystems in northern Greece.本地社会资本与保护区政策的接受度:希腊北部两个拉姆萨尔河口湿地生态系统的实证研究。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Apr 15;96(1):55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.10.012. Epub 2011 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
A multi-criterion approach for prioritizing areas in urban ecosystems for active restoration following invasive plant control.一种用于在入侵植物控制后对城市生态系统中的优先区域进行主动恢复的多准则方法。
Environ Manage. 2018 Dec;62(6):1150-1167. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1103-9. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
2
Temporal Dynamics of the Driving Factors of Urban Landscape Change of Addis Ababa During the Past Three Decades.过去三十年埃塞俄比亚首都亚的斯亚贝巴城市景观变化的驱动因素的时间动态。
Environ Manage. 2018 Jan;61(1):132-146. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0953-x. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
3
Identification of the Criteria for Decision Making of Cut-Away Peatland Reuse.
确定泥炭地复垦决策标准
Environ Manage. 2017 Mar;59(3):505-521. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0797-9. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
4
Capturing and explaining preference heterogeneity for wetland management options in the Kilombero Valley, Tanzania.捕捉并解释坦桑尼亚基洛梅罗河谷湿地管理方案的偏好异质性。
Environ Manage. 2015 Jan;55(1):100-12. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0403-y. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
5
Factors influencing farmers' willingness to participate in the conversion of cultivated land to wetland program in Sanjiang National Nature Reserve, China.影响中国三江国家级自然保护区耕地向湿地转化计划中农民参与意愿的因素。
Environ Manage. 2011 Jan;47(1):107-20. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9586-z. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
6
Catchment-wide wetland assessment and prioritization using the multi-criteria decision-making method TOPSIS.运用多准则决策方法TOPSIS进行全流域湿地评估与优先级排序。
Environ Manage. 2006 Aug;38(2):316-26. doi: 10.1007/s00267-005-0151-0.