Takeda Tomotaka, Ishigami Keiichi, Shintaro Kawamura, Nakajima Kazunori, Shimada Atsushi, Regner Connell Wayne
Department of Sports Dentistry, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Dent Traumatol. 2004 Feb;20(1):12-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-4469.2004.00210.x.
Most impact force and impact energy absorption tests for mouthguards have used a steel ball in a drop-ball or the pendulum device. However, in reality most sports-related trauma is caused by objects other than the steel ball, e.g. various sized balls, hockey puck, or bat or stick. Also, the elasticity, the velocity and the mass of the object could change the degree and the extent of injuries. In this study, we attempted to measure the impact force from actual sports equipment in order to clarify the exact mechanism of dental-related sports injuries and the protective effects of mouthguards. The present study was conducted using the pendulum impact device and load cell. Impact objects were removable. Seven mobile impact objects were selected for testing: a steel ball, baseball, softball, field hockey ball, ice hockey puck, cricket ball, and wooden baseball bat. The mouthguard material used in this study was a 3-mm-thick Drufosoft (Dreve-Dentamid GmbH, Unna, Germany), and test samples were made of the one-layer type. The peak transmitted forces without mouthguard ranged from the smallest (ice hockey stick, 46.9 kgf) to the biggest (steel ball, 481.6 kgf). The peak transmitted forces were smaller when the mouthguard was attached than without it for all impact materials but the effect was significantly influenced by the object type. The steel ball showed the biggest (62.1%) absorption ability while the wooden bat showed the second biggest (38.3%). The other balls or the puck showed from 0.6 to 6.0% absorbency. These results show that it is important to test the effectiveness of mouthguards on specific types of sports equipment. In future, we may select different materials and mouthguard designs suitable for specific sports.
大多数针对护齿器的冲击力和冲击能量吸收测试都使用落球或摆锤装置中的钢球。然而,在现实中,大多数与运动相关的创伤是由钢球以外的物体造成的,例如各种尺寸的球、曲棍球圆盘或球棒。此外,物体的弹性、速度和质量可能会改变受伤的程度和范围。在本研究中,我们试图测量来自实际运动器材的冲击力,以阐明与牙齿相关的运动损伤的确切机制以及护齿器的保护作用。本研究使用摆锤冲击装置和测力传感器进行。冲击物体是可拆卸的。选择了七个可移动的冲击物体进行测试:一个钢球、棒球、垒球、曲棍球、冰球、板球和木制棒球棒。本研究中使用的护齿器材料是一种3毫米厚的Drufosoft(德国乌纳的Dreve-Dentamid GmbH公司),测试样品为单层类型。不使用护齿器时的峰值传递力范围从最小的(冰球棍,46.9千克力)到最大的(钢球,481.6千克力)。对于所有冲击材料,使用护齿器时的峰值传递力都比不使用时小,但效果受到物体类型的显著影响。钢球显示出最大的(62.1%)吸收能力,而木制球棒显示出第二大的(38.3%)。其他球或圆盘的吸收能力在0.6%至6.0%之间。这些结果表明,测试护齿器对特定类型运动器材的有效性很重要。未来,我们可能会选择适合特定运动的不同材料和护齿器设计。