Togo Shinji, Sakaue Takahiro, Tsutsui Arata, Matsuda Yoshiaki, Nakajima Kazunori, Takeda Tomotaka, Fukuda Kenichi, Vallittu Pekka, Lassila Lippo
Division of Sports Dentistry, Department of Oral Health and Clinical Science, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Division of Special Needs Dentistry and Orofacial Pain, Department of Oral Health and Clinical Science, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Eur J Dent. 2024 Oct;18(4):1048-1061. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1779427. Epub 2024 May 14.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the mechanical properties and impact absorption capacity of prototype materials comprising ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) of different hardness reinforced using different amounts of glass fibers (GFs), considering a buffer space.
Six prototype materials were made by adding E-GFs (5 and 10 wt%) to EVA with vinyl acetate (VA) contents of 9.4 wt% ("hard" or HA) and 27.5 wt% ("soft" or SO). Durometer hardness and tensile strength tests were performed to evaluate the mechanical properties of the materials. Moreover, an impact test was conducted using a customized pendulum impact tester to assess the impact absorption capacity (with or without a buffer space) of the specimens.
The mechanical properties of the prototypes, namely, durometer hardness, Young's modulus, and tensile strength, were significantly higher in the HA group than in the SO group, regardless of the presence or added amount of GFs. The addition of GFs, particularly in a large amount (10 wt%), significantly increased these values. In terms of the impact absorption capacity, the original hardness of the EVA material, that is, its VA content, had a more substantial effect than the presence or absence of GFs and the added amount of GFs. Interestingly, the HA specimens with the buffer space exhibited significantly higher impact absorption capacities than the SO specimens. Meanwhile, the SO specimens without the buffer space exhibited significantly higher impact absorption capacities than the HA specimens. Moreover, regardless of the sample material and impact distance, the buffer space significantly improved impact absorption. In particular, with the buffer space, the impact absorption capacity increased with the added amount of GFs.
The basic mechanical properties, including durometer hardness, Young's modulus, and tensile strength, of the EVA prototype were significantly increased by reducing the amount of VA regardless of the presence or added amount of GFs. Adding GFs, particularly in large amounts, significantly increased the values of aforementioned mechanical properties. Impact absorption was significantly affected by the hardness of the original EVA material and enhanced by the addition of the buffer space. The HA specimen had a high shock absorption capacity with the buffer space, and the SO specimen had a high shock absorption capacity without the buffer space. With the buffer space, impact absorption improved with the amount of added GFs.
本研究的目的是评估在考虑缓冲空间的情况下,由不同硬度的乙烯-醋酸乙烯酯(EVA)与不同含量玻璃纤维(GFs)增强制成的原型材料的力学性能和冲击吸收能力。
通过向醋酸乙烯酯(VA)含量分别为9.4 wt%(“硬”或HA)和27.5 wt%(“软”或SO)的EVA中添加E-GFs(5 wt%和10 wt%)制备了六种原型材料。进行硬度测试和拉伸强度测试以评估材料的力学性能。此外,使用定制的摆锤冲击试验机进行冲击试验,以评估试样的冲击吸收能力(有无缓冲空间)。
无论GFs的存在与否或添加量如何,HA组原型材料的力学性能,即硬度、杨氏模量和拉伸强度,均显著高于SO组。添加GFs,尤其是大量添加(10 wt%),显著提高了这些值。就冲击吸收能力而言,EVA材料的原始硬度,即其VA含量,比GFs的存在与否和添加量的影响更大。有趣的是,有缓冲空间的HA试样的冲击吸收能力显著高于SO试样。同时,没有缓冲空间的SO试样的冲击吸收能力显著高于HA试样。此外,无论样品材料和冲击距离如何,缓冲空间均显著提高了冲击吸收能力。特别是,有缓冲空间时,冲击吸收能力随GFs添加量的增加而增加。
无论GFs的存在与否或添加量如何,通过减少VA量,EVA原型的基本力学性能,包括硬度、杨氏模量和拉伸强度均显著提高。添加GFs,尤其是大量添加,显著提高了上述力学性能的值。冲击吸收受原始EVA材料硬度的显著影响,并通过添加缓冲空间得到增强。有缓冲空间时,HA试样具有高减震能力,无缓冲空间时,SO试样具有高减震能力。有缓冲空间时,冲击吸收随GFs添加量的增加而改善。