Suppr超能文献

微创与传统冠状动脉搭桥术后中风的时间分布

Chronologic distribution of stroke after minimally invasive versus conventional coronary artery bypass.

作者信息

Peel Garrett K, Stamou Sotiris C, Dullum Mercedes K C, Hill Peter C, Jablonski Kathleen A, Bafi Ammar S, Boyce Steven W, Petro Kathleen R, Corso Paul J

机构信息

Section of Cardiac Surgery, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Mar 3;43(5):752-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.09.047.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We sought to investigate whether the chronologic distribution of the onset of stroke occurring after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump CABG) is different from the conventional on-pump approach (CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass).

BACKGROUND

Off-pump CABG has been associated with a lower stroke rate, compared with conventional on-pump CABG. However, it is unknown whether the chronologic distribution of the onset of stroke is different between the two approaches.

METHODS

We evaluated the chronologic distribution of postoperative stroke in patients undergoing CABG from June 1996 to August 2001 (n = 10,573). Preoperative risk factors for stroke were identified using the Northern New England preoperative estimate of stroke risk. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent predictors of early stroke and to delineate the association between the surgical approach and the chronologic distribution of the onset of stroke.

RESULTS

Stroke occurred in 217 patients (2%, n = 10,573). A total of 44 (20%) and 173 (80%) of these patients had stroke after off-pump CABG and on-pump CABG, respectively. The median time for the onset of stroke was two days (range 0 to 11 days) after on-pump CABG versus four days (range 0 to 14 days) after off-pump CABG (p < 0.01). On-pump CABG was associated with a higher risk of early stroke (odds ratio 5.3, 95% confidence interval 2.6 to 10.9; p < 0.01) compared with off-pump CABG.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with off-pump CABG, on-pump CABG is associated with an earlier onset of postoperative stroke during the recovery phase, suggesting different mechanisms in the pathogenesis of stroke between the two surgical approaches.

摘要

目的

我们试图研究在非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术(非体外循环CABG)后发生的卒中发作的时间分布是否与传统的体外循环方法(体外循环CABG)不同。

背景

与传统的体外循环CABG相比,非体外循环CABG的卒中发生率较低。然而,两种方法之间卒中发作的时间分布是否不同尚不清楚。

方法

我们评估了1996年6月至2001年8月接受CABG的患者(n = 10,573)术后卒中的时间分布。使用新英格兰北部术前卒中风险评估来确定术前卒中危险因素。多因素逻辑回归分析用于确定早期卒中的独立预测因素,并描述手术方法与卒中发作时间分布之间的关联。

结果

217例患者(2%,n = 10,573)发生卒中。这些患者中,分别有44例(20%)和173例(80%)在非体外循环CABG和体外循环CABG后发生卒中。体外循环CABG后卒中发作的中位时间为术后两天(范围0至11天),而非体外循环CABG后为四天(范围0至14天)(p < 0.01)。与非体外循环CABG相比,体外循环CABG与早期卒中风险更高相关(比值比5.3,95%置信区间2.6至10.9;p < 0.01)。

结论

与非体外循环CABG相比,体外循环CABG在恢复阶段术后卒中发作更早,提示两种手术方法在卒中发病机制上存在不同机制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验