Suppr超能文献

长效 gepirone 在重度抑郁症中的持续疗效:一项双盲安慰剂替代试验。

Sustained efficacy of gepirone-IR in major depressive disorder: a double-blind placebo substitution trial.

作者信息

Amsterdam Jay D, Brunswick David J, Gibertini Michael

机构信息

Depression Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, University Science Center, 3535 Market Street, 3rd Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2004 May-Jun;38(3):259-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2003.10.005.

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to evaluate the efficacy of gepirone immediate-release (gepirone-IR) for relapse prevention in outpatients with MDD who had responded to initial gepirone-IR therapy. Patients with MDD and a HAM-D(25) score > or = 20 were treated with open-label gepirone-IR 20 to 90 mg/day for 6 weeks. Responders with a HAM-D(17) total score < or = 12 or with a > or = 50% reduction in total HAM-D(17) score and at least a "much improved" or "very much improved" CGI improvement score, were randomized to gepirone-IR or placebo for six additional weeks. Time to relapse was defined in six ways [(1) return to > or = 75% of baseline HAM-D(17) total score; (2) CGI improvement score of "no change" or "minimally worse," "much worse" or "very much worse" than baseline (> or = 4); and four more definitions combining the HAM-D(17) or CGI criteria with discontinuation, or discontinuation due to lack of efficacy] and analyzed for the ITT population using the LOCF method. Of 134 patients in the open-label phase, 70 were responders. In the double-blind phase, the relapse rate was significantly lower with gepirone-IR than with placebo (P < or = 0.05) for four of the six definitions of relapse. Discontinuations of gepirone-IR due to adverse events were observed for 26.9% of patients in the open-label phase, and four patients (6%) during the double-blind phase. The most frequent adverse events with gepirone-IR were dizziness, nausea, headache, and somnolence, and with placebo were headache and paresthesia. A relapse-prevention study of longer duration is needed to confirm these preliminary results. Gepirone-IR was significantly more effective than placebo for relapse prevention and demonstrated acceptable tolerability in outpatient responders with MDD.

摘要

本文的目的是评估速释型阿戈美拉汀(gepirone-IR)对已对初始速释型阿戈美拉汀治疗有反应的中度抑郁障碍(MDD)门诊患者预防复发的疗效。MDD患者且汉密尔顿抑郁量表(25项版本,HAM-D(25))评分≥20分,接受为期6周的开放标签速释型阿戈美拉汀治疗,剂量为每日20至90毫克。汉密尔顿抑郁量表(17项版本,HAM-D(17))总分≤12分,或HAM-D(17)总分降低≥50%且临床总体印象量表(CGI)改善评分至少为“明显改善”或“非常明显改善”的有反应者,被随机分为速释型阿戈美拉汀组或安慰剂组,再治疗6周。复发时间通过六种方式定义:(1)回到基线HAM-D(17)总分的≥75%;(2)CGI改善评分与基线相比为“无变化”或“稍有恶化”、“明显恶化”或“非常明显恶化”(≥4);以及另外四种将HAM-D(17)或CGI标准与停药或因缺乏疗效而停药相结合的定义,并使用末次观察结转(LOCF)方法对意向性治疗(ITT)人群进行分析。在开放标签阶段的134名患者中,70名有反应。在双盲阶段,对于六种复发定义中的四种,速释型阿戈美拉汀组的复发率显著低于安慰剂组(P≤0.05)。在开放标签阶段,26.9%的患者因不良事件停用速释型阿戈美拉汀,在双盲阶段有4名患者(6%)停用。速释型阿戈美拉汀最常见的不良事件是头晕、恶心、头痛和嗜睡,安慰剂组是头痛和感觉异常。需要进行更长时间的预防复发研究来证实这些初步结果。速释型阿戈美拉汀在预防复发方面显著优于安慰剂,并且在MDD门诊有反应者中表现出可接受的耐受性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验