Reinhard T, Böhringer D, Enczmann J, Kögler G, Mayweg S, Wernet P, Sundmacher R
Eye Hospital, Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Germany.
Eye (Lond). 2004 Mar;18(3):269-77. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700636.
Owing to contradictory results, HLA matching in penetrating keratoplasty still is equivocal. Different surgical techniques in multicentre studies, missing risk differentiation in high-risk situations, and faulty HLA typing can be identified as main reasons for these contradictory results. In this monocentre study, the value of HLA class I and II matching (A, B, DR loci) was examined in a homogeneous group of 418 normal-risk keratoplasty patients using serological typing techniques for HLA class I and immunogenetic typing techniques for class II.
Penetrating normal-risk keratoplasty was performed in two groups of patients (group I with 0-2, group II with 3-6 mismatches in the A/B/DR loci). All surgery was carried out by three experienced surgeons according to a standardized scheme. Furthermore, postoperative therapy and controls were standardized. There were no statistically significant differences between the two study groups with regard to the number of ABO or H-Y compatibilities, patient age, patient gender, ratio of previous intraocular surgery, ratio of triple procedures, indication for surgery, follow-up period, donor age, donor gender, post-mortem time of the graft, and endothelial cell density of the graft at the end of organ culture. All HLA typing was performed in a quality-controlled laboratory, serologically for HLA class I (A and B loci) and immunogenetically for HLA class II (DR locus).
At 4 years postoperatively, the ratio of clear and rejection-free graft survival was 92% in group I and 66% in group II (Kaplan-Meier estimation, log rank test, P=0.03). Monovariate analysis in the Cox model gave no influence of solitary HLA class I or II matching, but only an influence of combined HLA class I and II matching (P=0.03).
In this monocentre study with proper typing techniques, the beneficial effect of HLA class I plus II matching on clear and rejection-free graft survival could be demonstrated in a homogeneous group of normal-risk keratoplasty patients.
由于结果相互矛盾,穿透性角膜移植术中的 HLA 配型仍不明确。多中心研究中不同的手术技术、高危情况下风险区分的缺失以及错误的 HLA 分型可被确定为这些矛盾结果的主要原因。在这项单中心研究中,使用 HLA Ⅰ类血清学分型技术和 HLA Ⅱ类免疫遗传分型技术,对 418 例正常风险角膜移植患者的同质组进行了 HLA Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类配型(A、B、DR 位点)的价值研究。
对两组患者进行穿透性正常风险角膜移植(Ⅰ组 A/B/DR 位点错配 0 - 2 个,Ⅱ组错配 3 - 6 个)。所有手术均由三位经验丰富的外科医生按照标准化方案进行。此外,术后治疗和检查也进行了标准化。在 ABO 或 H - Y 相容性数量、患者年龄、患者性别、既往眼内手术比例、三联手术比例、手术指征、随访时间、供体年龄、供体性别、移植物死后时间以及器官培养结束时移植物的内皮细胞密度方面,两个研究组之间无统计学显著差异。所有 HLA 分型均在质量控制实验室进行,HLA Ⅰ类(A 和 B 位点)采用血清学方法,HLA Ⅱ类(DR 位点)采用免疫遗传学方法。
术后 4 年,Ⅰ组透明且无排斥反应的移植物存活比例为 92%,Ⅱ组为 66%(Kaplan - Meier 估计,对数秩检验,P = 0.03)。Cox 模型中的单变量分析显示,单独的 HLA Ⅰ类或Ⅱ类配型无影响,但 HLA Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类联合配型有影响(P = 0.03)。
在这项采用适当分型技术的单中心研究中,在正常风险角膜移植患者的同质组中,可证明 HLA Ⅰ类加Ⅱ类配型对透明且无排斥反应的移植物存活具有有益作用。