相似文献
1
[DNA profile in legal practice. Conclusion].
J Soc Biol. 2003;197(4):361-2.
2
[DNA profile in legal practice].
J Soc Biol. 2003;197(4):329-31.
3
When privacy fails: invoking a property paradigm to mandate the destruction of DNA samples.
Duke Law J. 2004 Oct;53(7):179-219.
4
[Genetic fingerprints and computerised databases].
J Soc Biol. 2003;197(4):337-40.
5
Whose DNA is it anyway? European court, junk DNA, and the problem with prediction.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2010;38(2):247-50.
6
DNA databanks: when has a good thing gone too far?
Syracuse Law Rev. 2002;52(3):951-77.
7
Willing to give up their DNA, but privacy too?
Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed). 2000 Apr 13;92(99):1, 9.
8
I-DNA-fication, personal privacy, and social justice.
Chic Kent Law Rev. 1999;75:61-82.
9
Reclaiming "abandoned" DNA: the Fourth Amendment and genetic privacy.
Northwest Univ Law Rev. 2006 Winter;100(2):857-84.
10
Is legislative principalism an illusion and perverse policy? A critical opinion of the French regulation and practice of genetic tests.
J Int Bioethique. 2003 Sep-Dec;14(3-4):121-33. doi: 10.3917/jib.143.0121.
Zotero 插件