PO Box 3544, Wokingham, Berkshire, RG40 9FA, UK.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2010;38(2):247-50.
In this article, we discuss the implications of a recent European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) decision about the use of retained DNA profiles in criminal cases. Met with polar but equal passion from both the privacy lobby and law enforcement, this case has opened concerns regarding ethics in the nascent science of DNA profiling. Although the technology is touted as the most exciting breakthrough since fingerprinting in crime solving, there are questions regarding its use. The case decided by the ECHR intensified the debate on privacy, state control of information, and the public's right to be safe. New proposals in response, however, raise more questions than they sought to answer, ranging from unfettered data mining to the pitfalls in risk prediction.
在本文中,我们讨论了最近欧洲人权法院(ECHR)关于在刑事案件中使用保留的 DNA 图谱的决定所带来的影响。这一案例引起了隐私游说团体和执法部门的强烈反对,引发了人们对 DNA 图谱这一新兴科学领域的伦理问题的关注。尽管该技术被誉为犯罪侦破中指纹技术之后最令人兴奋的突破,但人们对其使用仍存在疑问。ECHR 裁决的这一案例加剧了关于隐私、国家对信息的控制以及公众安全权利的争论。然而,为应对这一情况而提出的新提案引发的问题多于其试图回答的问题,从不受限制的数据挖掘到风险预测的陷阱等不一而足。