Langley Paul C
Adjunct Professor, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20(2):181-8. doi: 10.1185/030079903125002838.
The purpose of this paper is to consider the role of pharmacoeconomic activities in the drug life cycle and not just as activities to support reimbursement applications and market entry. These activities are important in establishing the value case for a drug product to both internal and external audiences. Unless these activities are fully integrated into establishing the business case for a product from the pre-phase I period of drug discovery, manufacturers run the risk of establishing a unit price for the product and claims for cost-effectiveness which are inconsistent with achieving reimbursement. Importantly, manufacturers need to consider at an early stage the evidentiary and analytical needs for product evaluation under formulary submission guidelines (AMCP; NICE) and the integration of pharmacoeconomic activities over the life cycle. These activities include justifying assumptions for business opportunity assessments and an early commitment to developing a mock reimbursement submission at post-phase II. The integration of pharmacoeconomic activities in the drug cycle is not only an antidote to excessive clinical optimism but also provides the basis for an effective assessment of the likely performance of new products in the health-care market place at a price and formulary position acceptable both to the manufacturer and the reimburser.
本文的目的是探讨药物经济学活动在药物生命周期中的作用,而不仅仅是作为支持报销申请和市场准入的活动。这些活动对于向内部和外部受众确立药品的价值依据非常重要。除非这些活动在药物研发的I期前阶段就全面融入产品商业案例的建立过程中,否则制造商面临为产品确定单价以及声称成本效益却与实现报销不一致的风险。重要的是,制造商需要在早期阶段就考虑根据处方集提交指南(AMCP;NICE)进行产品评估的证据和分析需求,以及药物经济学活动在整个生命周期中的整合。这些活动包括为商业机会评估证明假设合理,以及在II期后尽早承诺制定模拟报销申请。将药物经济学活动整合到药物周期中,不仅是对过度临床乐观情绪的一剂解药,也为以制造商和报销方都能接受的价格和处方集地位有效评估新产品在医疗保健市场的可能表现提供了基础。