Hennig Lars, Menges Margit, Murray James A H, Gruissem Wilhelm
Institute of Plant Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH Zentrum, Universitätstrasse 2, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
Plant Mol Biol. 2003 Nov;53(4):457-65. doi: 10.1023/B:PLAN.0000019069.23317.97.
DNA microarrays are becoming a frequently used research tool. Whilst several studies have confirmed the reproducibility of analysing the same RNA samples on duplicate arrays, there is little analysis of the reproducibility of the results of transcript profiling between microarrays carrying different probes to a common set of genes. To address this question, we compared the performance and reproducibility of two microarrays commonly used in plant research, the Affymetrix Arabidopsis AG array containing more than 8000 probe sets and the Affymetrix Arabidopsis ATH1 array containing more than 22,000 redesigned probe sets. A total of 21 different RNA samples were labelled and hybridized in parallel to the two microarray types. Focusing on the overlap of more than 7300 targets detected with both arrays, we found a high degree of reproducibility. Despite the use of different probe sets, both signal and signal log ratio were very similar for most genes. However, genes that were called absent or not changed by Affymetrix' statistical algorithm implemented in MAS5.0 showed considerably less conservation of expression patterns. Moreover, we identified about 300 genes that yielded strongly different measurements with the two microarrays, emphasizing that RNA profiling data need careful interpretation. Overall, this study shows that results obtained with ATH1 and AG arrays are very comparable and hence that the analysis is largely independent of probe sets. However, the result emphasize the need for appropriate filtering schemes such as those based on the present and change calls provided by MAS5.0 rather than reliance solely on signal values.
DNA微阵列正成为一种常用的研究工具。虽然有几项研究证实了在重复阵列上分析相同RNA样本的可重复性,但对于携带不同探针针对一组共同基因的微阵列之间转录本谱分析结果的可重复性,几乎没有分析。为了解决这个问题,我们比较了植物研究中常用的两种微阵列的性能和可重复性,即包含8000多个探针集的Affymetrix拟南芥AG阵列和包含22000多个重新设计探针集的Affymetrix拟南芥ATH1阵列。总共21种不同的RNA样本被标记并与这两种微阵列类型平行杂交。聚焦于两种阵列都检测到的7300多个靶标的重叠部分,我们发现了高度的可重复性。尽管使用了不同的探针集,但大多数基因的信号和信号对数比都非常相似。然而,通过MAS5.0中实施的Affymetrix统计算法被判定为不存在或未改变的基因,其表达模式的保守性要低得多。此外,我们鉴定出约300个基因,这两种微阵列对它们的测量结果差异很大,这强调了RNA谱分析数据需要仔细解读。总体而言,这项研究表明,ATH1和AG阵列获得的结果具有很强的可比性,因此分析在很大程度上独立于探针集。然而,结果强调了需要适当的过滤方案,例如基于MAS5.0提供的存在和变化判定的方案,而不是仅仅依赖信号值。