Kirkwood John M, Manola Judith, Ibrahim Joseph, Sondak Vernon, Ernstoff Marc S, Rao Uma
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Mar 1;10(5):1670-7. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-1103-3.
Nearly 2000 patients with stage IIB and III melanoma have participated in four multicenter, randomized trials, conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and the Intergroup, investigating adjuvant high-dose IFN-alpha 2b therapy. The objectives of this study were to update the analyses of each individual trial and to analyze prognostic factors and treatment effects based on pooled data.
Survival and disease status were updated to April 2001. Analysis of prognostic factors using optimized statistical models was based on data from patients in E1684, E1690, E1694, and E2696. Analysis of treatment effects versus observation (Obs) was based on data from 713 patients randomized to high-dose IFN-alpha 2b (HDI) or Obs in Trials E1684 and E1690.
Updated analysis of E1684, E1690, and E1694 confirmed their original conclusions, now at median follow-up intervals of 2.1-12.6 years. Based on two-sided univariate log-rank analysis of pooled data from E1684 and E1690 (median follow-up, 7.2 years), relapse-free survival (RFS)-but not overall survival (OS)-was significantly prolonged (two-sided log-rank P value = 0.006) for patients treated with HDI versus Obs. Among all patients, prognostic factors that significantly negatively impacted RFS and OS included ulceration, recurrent disease at entry, enrollment in E1684, and age > 49 years. Multivariate statistical models adjusting for these factors confirmed the statistically significant RFS benefit of HDI versus Obs but did not demonstrate a significant OS benefit in the pooled populations.
In patients with high-risk resected melanoma, HDI is effective adjuvant therapy with strong evidence for improved RFS and evidence for moderate improvement in OS based on two prospective randomized studies but not the pooled analysis. Analyses of predictors of relapse and response are now needed to improve the therapeutic value of this modality.
近2000例IIB期和III期黑色素瘤患者参与了由东部肿瘤协作组和肿瘤协作组开展的四项多中心随机试验,研究辅助性高剂量干扰素α-2b治疗。本研究的目的是更新对每项单独试验的分析,并基于汇总数据分析预后因素和治疗效果。
生存和疾病状态更新至2001年4月。使用优化统计模型对预后因素的分析基于E1684、E1690、E1694和E2696试验中患者的数据。对治疗效果与观察(Obs)的分析基于试验E1684和E1690中随机分配至高剂量干扰素α-2b(HDI)或Obs的713例患者的数据。
对E1684、E1690和E1694的更新分析证实了其原结论,目前中位随访间隔为2.1 - 12.6年。基于对E1684和E1690汇总数据的双侧单变量对数秩分析(中位随访7.2年),接受HDI治疗的患者与接受Obs治疗的患者相比,无复发生存期(RFS)显著延长(双侧对数秩P值 = 0.006),但总生存期(OS)未显著延长。在所有患者中,对RFS和OS有显著负面影响的预后因素包括溃疡、入组时疾病复发、入组E1684以及年龄>49岁。针对这些因素进行调整的多变量统计模型证实了HDI与Obs相比在RFS方面具有统计学显著益处,但在汇总人群中未显示出OS方面的显著益处。
在高危切除性黑色素瘤患者中,基于两项前瞻性随机研究,HDI是有效的辅助治疗,有强有力的证据表明可改善RFS,也有证据表明可适度改善OS,但汇总分析未显示此结果。现在需要对复发和反应的预测因素进行分析,以提高这种治疗方式的治疗价值。