Escobar-Páramo Patricia, Clermont Olivier, Blanc-Potard Anne-Béatrice, Bui Hung, Le Bouguénec Chantal, Denamur Erick
INSERM E0339, Faculté de Médecine Xavier Bichat, Paris, France.
Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Jun;21(6):1085-94. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msh118. Epub 2004 Mar 10.
In bacteria, the evolution of pathogenicity seems to be the result of the constant arrival of virulence factors (VFs) into the bacterial genome. However, the integration, retention, and/or expression of these factors may be the result of the interaction between the new arriving genes and the bacterial genomic background. To test this hypothesis, a phylogenetic analysis was done on a collection of 98 Escherichia coli/Shigella strains representing the pathogenic and commensal diversity of the species. The distribution of 17 VFs associated to the different E. coli pathovars was superimposed on the phylogenetic tree. Three major types of VFs can be recognized: (1) VFs that arrive and are expressed in different genetic backgrounds (such as VFs associated with the pathovars of mild chronic diarrhea: enteroaggregative, enteropathogenic, and diffusely-adhering E. coli), (2) VFs that arrive in different genetic backgrounds but are preferentially found, associated with a specific pathology, in only one particular background (such as VFs associated with extraintestinal diseases), and (3) VFs that require a particular genetic background for the arrival and expression of their virulence potential (such as VFs associated with pathovars typical of severe acute diarrhea: enterohemorragic, enterotoxigenic, and enteroinvasive E. coli strains). The possibility of a single arrival of VFs by chance, followed by a vertical transmission, was ruled out by comparing the evolutionary histories of some of these VFs to the strain phylogeny. These evidences suggest that important changes in the genome of E. coli have occurred during the diversification of the species, allowing the virulence factors associated with severe acute diarrhea to arrive in the population. Thus, the E. coli genome seems to be formed by an "ancestral" and a "derived" background, each one responsible for the acquisition and expression of different virulence factors.
在细菌中,致病性的进化似乎是毒力因子(VFs)不断进入细菌基因组的结果。然而,这些因子的整合、保留和/或表达可能是新进入基因与细菌基因组背景之间相互作用的结果。为了验证这一假设,对代表该物种致病性和共生多样性的98株大肠杆菌/志贺氏菌菌株进行了系统发育分析。与不同大肠杆菌致病型相关的17种毒力因子的分布叠加在系统发育树上。可以识别出三种主要类型的毒力因子:(1)在不同遗传背景中出现并表达的毒力因子(如与轻度慢性腹泻致病型相关的毒力因子:肠聚集性、肠致病性和弥漫性黏附性大肠杆菌),(2)在不同遗传背景中出现但仅在一种特定背景中优先发现且与特定病理学相关的毒力因子(如与肠外疾病相关的毒力因子),以及(3)其毒力潜能的出现和表达需要特定遗传背景的毒力因子(如与严重急性腹泻典型致病型相关的毒力因子:肠出血性、产肠毒素性和侵袭性大肠杆菌菌株)。通过比较其中一些毒力因子的进化历史与菌株系统发育,排除了毒力因子偶然单次出现后垂直传播的可能性。这些证据表明,在该物种多样化过程中,大肠杆菌基因组发生了重要变化,使得与严重急性腹泻相关的毒力因子得以进入种群。因此,大肠杆菌基因组似乎由一个“祖先”背景和一个“衍生”背景组成,每个背景负责不同毒力因子的获得和表达。