Suppr超能文献

研究伦理委员会评估定性研究的考量因素:一项针对青春期女性的人种志研究的经验教训

Considerations for research ethics boards in evaluating qualitative studies: lessons from an ethnographic study with adolescent females.

作者信息

Banister Elizabeth

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 1700, Victoria BC V8W 2Y2, Canada.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 2002 Dec;35(8 Suppl.):567-70.

Abstract

Research ethics boards (REBs) have traditionally been required to evaluate quantitative research proposals. They are, however, increasingly facing the need to evaluate the ethical implications of proposals involving qualitative research. This article discusses one form of qualitative research, ethnography, in light of possible ethical concerns. It suggests ways in which ethical issues may be addressed, and provides examples drawn from an ethnographic study of adolescent girls' health concerns in their dating relationships. Recommendations for REBs are included.

摘要

传统上,研究伦理委员会(REBs)需要评估定量研究提案。然而,他们越来越需要评估涉及定性研究的提案的伦理影响。本文根据可能存在的伦理问题,讨论了一种定性研究形式——民族志。它提出了处理伦理问题的方法,并提供了一些实例,这些实例来自于一项关于少女恋爱关系中健康问题的民族志研究。文中还包括了对研究伦理委员会的建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验