Paraskevas S, Danser M M, Timmerman M F, Van der Velden U, Van der Weijden G A
Department of Periodontology, ACTA Academic Centre for Dentistry, Louwesweg 1, 1006 EA Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Mar;31(3):177-83. doi: 10.1111/j.0303-6979.2004.00466.x.
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the beneficial effect of using a dentifrice and mouthrinse containing amine fluoride (AmF) and stannous fluoride (SnF(2)) in a group of periodontal maintenance patients. Efficacy parameters were plaque, gingival inflammation, pocket depth and attachment loss. An additional parameter was development of stain.
In total, 80 patients who had been treated for moderate-to-severe periodontitis agreed to participate in this study. Subjects received supportive periodontal therapy at regular intervals of 3-4 months for at least a period of 1 year. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: (1). the test group used an AmF/SnF(2) dentifrice and mouthrinse and (2). the control group used a sodium fluoride (NaF)-containing dentifrice and mouthrinse. Clinical assessments were performed at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
The mean plaque index score after 3 months in the test group (0.24) was significantly lower than that in control group (0.34) (p<or=0.05), a difference that was maintained throughout the remainder of the study. In terms of bleeding on probing, at no point in time were significant differences between test and control group found. No significant differences were noted between the two groups, nor were there any significant changes in comparison with baseline values with respect to pocket depth and attachment level. At baseline, the mean percentage of sites with no staining was 98% for both the test and control groups. At all further assessments, the staining in both groups was elevated as compared with baseline. Smoking did not affect the outcome of the study.
The combined use of an AmF/SnF(2) dentifrice and mouthrinse did not affect the parameters of inflammation (bleeding upon marginal probing and probing pocket depth), but it has shown to be more effective in terms of plaque reduction when compared with the use of an NaF dentifrice and mouthrinse in a group of periodontal patients placed under regular maintenance care.
本研究旨在评估在一组牙周维护期患者中使用含胺氟(AmF)和氟化亚锡(SnF₂)的牙膏及漱口水的有益效果。疗效参数包括菌斑、牙龈炎症、牙周袋深度和附着丧失。另一个参数是牙渍的形成。
共有80名接受过中重度牙周炎治疗的患者同意参与本研究。受试者每隔3 - 4个月接受一次支持性牙周治疗,为期至少1年。患者被随机分为两组:(1)试验组使用含AmF/SnF₂的牙膏和漱口水;(2)对照组使用含氟化钠(NaF)的牙膏和漱口水。在基线、3、6、12、18和24个月时进行临床评估。
试验组3个月后的平均菌斑指数评分(0.24)显著低于对照组(0.34)(p≤0.05),这一差异在研究的其余时间内一直保持。在探诊出血方面,试验组和对照组在任何时间点均未发现显著差异。两组在牙周袋深度和附着水平方面与基线值相比均未发现显著差异,也没有任何显著变化。基线时,试验组和对照组无染色部位的平均百分比均为98%。在所有进一步评估中,两组的染色情况均较基线时有所升高。吸烟不影响研究结果。
在一组接受定期维护治疗的牙周病患者中,与使用含NaF的牙膏和漱口水相比,联合使用含AmF/SnF₂的牙膏和漱口水对炎症参数(边缘探诊出血和探诊牙周袋深度)没有影响,但在减少菌斑方面显示出更有效。