Spitz Lewis, Kiely Edward, Pierro Agostino
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London England, UK.
J Pediatr Surg. 2004 Mar;39(3):276-81; discussion 276-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2003.11.032.
The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcome in 173 children (104 M, 69 F) undergoing transposition since 1981.
The most common indications for esophageal replacement included failed repair of different varieties of esophageal atresia (127), caustic injury (23), and peptic strictures (8). A total of 81% of the patients were referred from other hospitals (50% from other countries). Age at operation ranged from 7 days to 17 years. The gastric transposition was performed using blunt mediastinal dissection only in 90 patients with an additional 81 patients undergoing lateral thoracotomy. The retrosternal position was used in 2 patients.
There were no graft failures including those who had previously failed gastric tube or Scharlilike operations. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 12% (all but 1 resolved spontaneously). Anastomotic stricture requiring dilatation occurred in 19.6%. Half of these patients had previous caustic esophageal injury. There were 9 deaths in the group (5.2%). One death occurred intraoperatively, 5 in the early postoperative period, and there were 3 late deaths. In more than 90% of our patients, the outcome was considered good to excellent in terms of absence of swallowing difficulties or other gastrointestinal symptoms. Many, however, preferred to eat small frequent meals. Poor outcome was particularly associated with multiple previous attempts at esophageal salvage. There was no deterioration in the function of the gastric transposition in those patients followed up for more than 10 years.
Gastric transposition for esophageal substitution is an acceptable procedure. It is attended by 5% mortality and a 12% leak rate. A total of 19.6% of the patients needed anastomotic dilatation for stricture. In the long term, good function has been maintained. Gastric transposition compares favorably with alternative methods of esophageal replacement.
本研究旨在分析自1981年以来173例接受转位手术的儿童(男104例,女69例)的治疗结果。
食管替代最常见的适应证包括各种类型食管闭锁修复失败(127例)、腐蚀性损伤(23例)和消化性狭窄(8例)。81%的患者来自其他医院(50%来自其他国家)。手术年龄从7天至17岁不等。仅90例患者采用钝性纵隔分离进行胃转位,另外81例患者接受侧开胸手术。2例患者采用胸骨后位。
未发生移植失败,包括那些先前胃管或类似沙氏手术失败的患者。吻合口漏发生率为12%(除1例外在所有病例中均自行缓解)。需要扩张的吻合口狭窄发生率为19.6%。这些患者中有一半曾有腐蚀性食管损伤。该组有9例死亡(5.2%)。1例死于术中,5例死于术后早期,3例为晚期死亡。在我们超过90%的患者中,就无吞咽困难或其他胃肠道症状而言,治疗结果被认为良好至极佳。然而,许多患者更喜欢少食多餐。治疗结果差尤其与先前多次尝试挽救食管有关。在随访超过10年的患者中,胃转位功能未恶化。
胃转位用于食管替代是一种可接受的手术。其死亡率为5%,漏率为12%。19.6%的患者因狭窄需要进行吻合口扩张。从长期来看,功能得以维持。胃转位与其他食管替代方法相比具有优势。