Hirschl Ronald B, Yardeni Dani, Oldham Keith, Sherman Neil, Siplovich Leo, Gross Eitan, Udassin Raphael, Cohen Zehavi, Nagar Hagith, Geiger James D, Coran Arnold G
C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0245, USA.
Ann Surg. 2002 Oct;236(4):531-9; discussion 539-41. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000030752.45065.D1.
To evaluate the authors' experience with gastric transposition as a method of esophageal replacement in children with congenital or acquired abnormalities of the esophagus.
Esophageal replacement in children is almost always done for benign disease and thus requires a conduit that will last more than 70 years. The organ most commonly used in the past has been colon; however, most series have been fraught with major complications and conduit loss. For these reasons, in 1985 the authors switched from using colon interpositions to gastric transpositions for esophageal replacement in infants and children.
The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 41 patients with the diagnoses of esophageal atresia (n = 26), corrosive injury (n = 8), leiomyomatosis (n = 5), and refractory gastroesophageal reflux (n = 2) who underwent gastric transposition for esophageal replacement.
Mean +/- SE age at the time of gastric transposition was 3.3 +/- 0.6 years. All but two transpositions were performed through the posterior mediastinum without mortality or loss of the gastric conduit despite previous surgery on the gastric fundus in 8 (20%), previous esophageal operations in 15 (37%), and previous esophageal perforations in 6 (15%) patients. Complications included esophagogastric anastomotic leak (n = 15, 36%), which uniformly resolved without intervention; stricture formation (n = 20, 49%), all of which no longer require dilation; and feeding intolerance necessitating jejunal feeding (n = 8, 20%) due to delayed gastric emptying (n = 3), feeding aversion related to the underlying anomaly (n = 1), or severe neurological impairment (n = 4). No redo anastomoses were required.
Gastric transposition reestablishes effective gastrointestinal continuity with few complications. Oral feeding and appropriate weight gain are achieved in most children. Therefore, gastric transposition is an appropriate alternative for esophageal replacement in infants and children.
评估作者采用胃转位术作为先天性或后天性食管异常患儿食管替代方法的经验。
儿童食管替代术几乎均用于良性疾病,因此需要一个能维持70多年的管道。过去最常用的器官是结肠;然而,大多数系列报道都充满了严重并发症和管道丢失问题。由于这些原因,1985年作者将婴儿和儿童食管替代术从使用结肠间置术改为胃转位术。
作者回顾性分析了41例诊断为食管闭锁(n = 26)、腐蚀性损伤(n = 8)、平滑肌瘤病(n = 5)和难治性胃食管反流(n = 2)并接受胃转位术进行食管替代的患者记录。
胃转位时的平均年龄±标准误为3.3±0.6岁。除2例转位术外,其余均通过后纵隔进行,尽管8例(20%)患者既往有胃底手术史、15例(37%)患者既往有食管手术史、6例(15%)患者既往有食管穿孔史,但均无死亡或胃管道丢失情况。并发症包括食管胃吻合口漏(n = 15,36%),均未经干预自行缓解;狭窄形成(n = 20,49%),所有患者均不再需要扩张;以及因胃排空延迟(n = 3)、与潜在异常相关的喂养厌恶(n = 1)或严重神经功能障碍(n = 4)导致喂养不耐受而需要空肠喂养(n = 8,20%)。无需再次吻合。
胃转位术可重建有效的胃肠连续性,并发症较少。大多数儿童可实现经口喂养并适当体重增加。因此,胃转位术是婴儿和儿童食管替代的合适选择。