Suppr超能文献

一项针对健康维护组织(HMO)中逾期未进行巴氏试验和乳房X线摄影检查的女性增加筛查的定制干预措施的成本效益。

Cost-effectiveness of a tailored intervention to increase screening in HMO women overdue for Pap test and mammography services.

作者信息

Lynch Frances L, Whitlock Evelyn P, Valanis Barbara G, Smith Sabina K

机构信息

Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR 97227, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2004 Apr;38(4):403-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.11.024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research has established the societal cost-effectiveness of providing breast and cervical cancer screening to women. Less is known about the cost of motivating women significantly overdue for services to receive screening.

METHODS

In this intent-to-treat study, a total of 254 women, aged 52-69, who were overdue for both Pap test and mammography, were randomized to two groups, a tailored, motivational outreach or usual care. For effectiveness, we calculated the percent of women who received both services within 14 months of randomization. We used a comprehensive cost model to estimate total cost, per-participant cost, and the incremental cost-effectiveness of delivering the outreach intervention from the health plan perspective. We also conducted sensitivity analyses around two key parameters, target population size and level of effectiveness.

RESULTS

Compared with usual care, outreach (P = 0.006) screened significantly more women. The intervention cost US dollars 167.62 (2000 U.S. dollars) for each woman randomized to outreach, and incremental cost-effectiveness of outreach over usual care was US dollars 818 per additional woman screened. Sensitivity analyses estimated incremental cost-effectiveness between Us dollars 19 and US dollars 90 per additional woman screened.

CONCLUSIONS

Larger health plans can likely increase Pap test and mammography services in this population for a relatively low cost using this outreach intervention.

摘要

背景

研究已证实为女性提供乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查具有社会成本效益。对于促使严重逾期未接受筛查服务的女性接受筛查的成本,了解较少。

方法

在这项意向性分析研究中,共有254名年龄在52至69岁之间、巴氏试验和乳房X线摄影均逾期的女性被随机分为两组,一组接受针对性的激励性外展服务,另一组接受常规护理。为评估有效性,我们计算了在随机分组后14个月内接受两项服务的女性比例。我们使用综合成本模型从健康计划的角度估计总成本、每位参与者的成本以及提供外展干预的增量成本效益。我们还围绕两个关键参数,即目标人群规模和有效性水平进行了敏感性分析。

结果

与常规护理相比,外展服务组(P = 0.006)筛查的女性显著更多。随机分配到外展服务组的每位女性的干预成本为167.62美元(2000年美元价值),外展服务相对于常规护理的增量成本效益为每多筛查一名女性818美元。敏感性分析估计,每多筛查一名女性的增量成本效益在19美元至90美元之间。

结论

规模较大的健康计划可能通过这种外展干预,以相对较低的成本增加该人群的巴氏试验和乳房X线摄影服务。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验