Zhang W, Jones A, Doherty M
Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Aug;63(8):901-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.018531. Epub 2004 Mar 5.
To assess the best available evidence for efficacy of paracetamol (acetaminophen) in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA).
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
Medline, Embase, Scientific Citation Index, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and conference abstracts in the past 2 years from the British Society for Rheumatology, the European League Against Rheumatism, the American College of Rheumatology, and the Osteoarthritis Research Society International.
10 RCTs including 1712 patients with either symptomatic OA of the knee (6 trials) or hip/knee (3 trials) or multiple joints (1 trial).
(a). effect size (ES) for pain, stiffness, and functional scores from baseline to end point; (b). rate ratio (RR) and number needed to treat for clinical response rate and patient preference for treatment.
Paracetamol was effective in relieving pain due to OA (ES = 0.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 0.41). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were better than paracetamol for pain relief (ES = 0.20, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.30). Clinical response rate was higher with NSAIDs than with paracetamol (RR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.41), and the number of patients who preferred NSAIDs was more than twice the number of those preferring paracetamol (RR = 2.46, 95% CI 1.51 to 4.12). NSAIDs were associated with more frequent gastrointestinal discomfort than paracetamol (RR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.75).
Paracetamol is an effective agent for pain relief due to OA. Although safer, it is less effective than NSAIDs. For safety reasons paracetamol should be the first line treatment, with NSAIDs reserved for those who do not respond.
评估对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)治疗骨关节炎(OA)疗效的现有最佳证据。
对随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medline、Embase、科学引文索引、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、考克兰图书馆,以及过去两年英国风湿病学会、欧洲抗风湿病联盟、美国风湿病学会和国际骨关节炎研究学会的会议摘要。
10项随机对照试验,共纳入1712例患者,其中6项试验为膝关节症状性骨关节炎患者,3项试验为髋关节/膝关节患者,1项试验为多关节患者。
(a)从基线到终点的疼痛、僵硬和功能评分的效应量(ES);(b)临床反应率和患者对治疗的偏好的率比(RR)及需治疗人数。
对乙酰氨基酚对缓解骨关节炎引起的疼痛有效(ES = 0.21,95%置信区间(CI)0.02至0.41)。非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)在缓解疼痛方面优于对乙酰氨基酚(ES = 0.20,95%CI 0.10至0.30)。非甾体抗炎药的临床反应率高于对乙酰氨基酚(RR = 1.24,95%CI 1.08至1.41),且偏好非甾体抗炎药的患者人数是偏好对乙酰氨基酚患者人数的两倍多(RR = 2.46,95%CI 1.51至4.12)。与对乙酰氨基酚相比,非甾体抗炎药引起胃肠道不适的频率更高(RR = 1.35,95%CI 1.05至1.75)。
对乙酰氨基酚是缓解骨关节炎疼痛的有效药物。虽然更安全,但它的效果不如非甾体抗炎药。出于安全考虑,对乙酰氨基酚应作为一线治疗药物,非甾体抗炎药则留给无反应者使用。