Waller John C
Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine, University College, London, UK.
Ann Sci. 2004 Apr;61(2):141-63. doi: 10.1080/00033790110117467.
In 1865 Francis Galton (1822-1911) published 'Hereditary Talent and Character', an elaborate attempt to prove the heritability of intelligence on the basis of pedigree data. It was the start of Galton's lifelong commitment to investigating the statistical patterns and physiological mechanisms of hereditary transmission. Most existing attempts to explain Galton's fascination for heredity have argued that he was driven by a commitment to conservative political ideologies to seek means of naturalizing human inequality. However, this paper shows that another factor of at least equal importance has been overlooked by Galton scholars: his determination during the 1860s to be accepted among the ranks of the Darwinian inner circle. By hitching his career to the fortunes of what looked likely to emerge as a new scientific elite, Galton felt that he could bypass the typically slow and uncertain route to achieving scientific distinction. For this essentially strategic reason, between 1860 and 1865 he drifted away from a set of existing scientific concerns that were failing to deliver the approbation that he desired. Earnestly seeking to ingratiate himself with the Darwinian lobby, he then toyed with a variety of potential research projects relevant to Darwinian evolution. Yet Galton consistently failed to stimulate the enthusiasm of the Darwinians. Finally, however, after several months of ruminating, in 1864 he settled on a study of eminent pedigrees as a subject that was both germane and highly useful to the Darwinian enterprise. Galton's willingness to shift the direction of his scientific career during the 1860s underscores the importance of examining the micro-politics of scientific careers in addition to their broader social and political context. This account also emphasizes the limitations of class-based explanations even when considering scientists whose work seems so manifestly indicative of ideological motivation.
1865年,弗朗西斯·高尔顿(1822 - 1911)发表了《遗传的天赋与性格》,这是一次精心的尝试,旨在根据谱系数据证明智力的遗传性。这是高尔顿毕生致力于研究遗传传递的统计模式和生理机制的开端。大多数现有的解释高尔顿对遗传着迷的尝试都认为,他是受保守政治意识形态的驱使,去寻求使人类不平等自然化的方法。然而,本文表明,高尔顿学者们忽略了另一个至少同等重要的因素:他在19世纪60年代决心跻身达尔文核心圈子。通过将自己的职业生涯与看似即将崛起成为新科学精英的命运联系在一起,高尔顿觉得他可以避开获得科学声誉通常缓慢且不确定的途径。出于这个基本的战略原因,在1860年至1865年期间,他背离了一系列未能给他带来他所期望认可的现有科学关注点。他热切地试图讨好达尔文主义阵营,于是尝试了各种与达尔文进化论相关的潜在研究项目。然而,高尔顿始终未能激发达尔文主义者的热情。不过,最终在经过几个月的思考后,1864年他选定了对杰出谱系的研究作为一个与达尔文主义事业既相关又非常有用的主题。高尔顿在19世纪60年代愿意改变其科学事业的方向,这凸显了除了科学事业更广泛的社会和政治背景之外,审视其微观政治的重要性。这个叙述也强调了基于阶级的解释的局限性,即使是在考虑那些其工作似乎明显表明有意识形态动机的科学家时。