Renwick Chris
Department of History, University of York, Heslington, York Y010 5DD, UK.
Br J Hist Sci. 2011 Sep;44(162 Pt 3):343-69. doi: 10.1017/s0007087410001524.
Having coined the word 'eugenics' and inspired leading biologists and statisticians of the early twentieth century, Francis Galton is often studied for his contributions to modern statistical biology. However, whilst documenting this part of his work, historians have frequently neglected crucial aspects of what motivated Galton to establish his eugenics research programme. Arguing that his work was shaped more by social than by biological science, this paper addresses these oversights by tracing the development of Galton's programme, from its roots in a debate about political economy to his appeals for it to be taken up by sociologists. In so doing, the paper not only returns Galton's ideas to their original context but also provides a reason to reflect on the place of the social sciences in history-of-science scholarship.
弗朗西斯·高尔顿创造了“优生学”一词,并启发了20世纪初的顶尖生物学家和统计学家,人们常常研究他对现代统计生物学的贡献。然而,在记录他这部分工作时,历史学家经常忽略了促使高尔顿建立其优生学研究项目的关键因素。本文认为他的工作更多地是由社会科学而非生物科学塑造的,通过追溯高尔顿项目的发展历程,从其源于一场关于政治经济学的辩论,到他呼吁社会学家接受该项目,来解决这些疏漏。这样做不仅将高尔顿的思想还原到其原始背景中,还提供了一个理由来反思社会科学在科学史学术研究中的地位。