• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阅读过程中的推理。

Inference during reading.

作者信息

McKoon G, Ratcliff R

机构信息

Psychology Department, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208.

出版信息

Psychol Rev. 1992 Jul;99(3):440-66. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.3.440.

DOI:10.1037/0033-295x.99.3.440
PMID:1502273
Abstract

Most current theories of text processing assume a constructionist view of inference processing. In this article, an alternative view is proposed, labeled the minimalist hypothesis. According to this hypothesis, the only inferences that are encoded automatically during reading are those that are based on easily available information, either from explicit statements in the text or from general knowledge, and those that are required to make statements in the text locally coherent. The minimalist hypothesis is shown to be supported by previous research and by the results of several new experiments. It is also argued that automatically encoded minimalist inferences provide the basic representation of textual information from which more goal-directed, purposeful inferences are constructed.

摘要

当前大多数文本处理理论都假定推理处理是一种建构主义观点。在本文中,我们提出了另一种观点,即最简假设。根据这一假设,阅读过程中自动编码的唯一推理是那些基于易于获取的信息的推理,这些信息要么来自文本中的明确陈述,要么来自常识,以及那些使文本在局部上连贯所需的推理。研究表明,先前的研究以及几个新实验的结果都支持最简假设。同时也有人认为,自动编码的最简推理提供了文本信息的基本表征,在此基础上可以构建更具目标导向、更有目的的推理。

相似文献

1
Inference during reading.阅读过程中的推理。
Psychol Rev. 1992 Jul;99(3):440-66. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.3.440.
2
Semantic associations and elaborative inference.语义关联与精细推理。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989 Mar;15(2):326-38. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.15.2.326.
3
Development of knowledge about the role of inference in text comprehension.关于推理在文本理解中作用的知识发展。
Child Dev. 1990 Aug;61(4):1011-23.
4
A computational modeling of semantic knowledge in reading comprehension: Integrating the landscape model with latent semantic analysis.阅读理解中语义知识的计算建模:将情境模型与潜在语义分析相结合。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):880-96. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0749-6.
5
Processing of new arguments at clause boundaries.在子句边界处处理新论据。
Mem Cognit. 1989 Mar;17(2):186-93. doi: 10.3758/bf03197068.
6
Representational change and analogy: how analogical inferences alter target representations.表征变化与类比:类比推理如何改变目标表征。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Jul;28(4):672-85.
7
Hemispheric processing of inferences: the effects of textual constraint and working memory capacity.推理的半球加工:文本限制和工作记忆容量的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Sep;34(6):1341-54. doi: 10.3758/bf03193276.
8
The role of textual semantic constraints in knowledge-based inference generation during reading comprehension: A computational approach.文本语义约束在阅读理解过程中基于知识的推理生成中的作用:一种计算方法。
Memory. 2015;23(8):1193-214. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.968169. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
9
On the relation between representations constructed from text comprehension and transitive inference production.关于从文本理解构建的表征与传递性推理生成之间的关系。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Jan;26(1):187-203. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.1.187.
10
How does background information improve memory for text content?背景信息如何提高对文本内容的记忆?
Mem Cognit. 2002 Jul;30(5):768-78. doi: 10.3758/bf03196432.

引用本文的文献

1
Aging and word predictability during reading: Evidence from eye movements and fixation-related potentials.阅读过程中的衰老与词汇可预测性:来自眼动和注视相关电位的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Jan;87(1):50-75. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02981-9. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
2
Effects of sequential and non-sequential presentation conditions of multiple-stem facts on memory integration and cognitive resource allocation.多线索事实的顺序和非顺序呈现条件对记忆整合和认知资源分配的影响。
Psychol Res. 2024 Nov 13;89(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02031-x.
3
Delayed predictive inference integration with and revision by low-competitive inference alternatives in Chinese narrative text reading.
中文叙事文本阅读中低竞争性推理选项的延迟预测推理整合与修正
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 4;15:1403479. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1403479. eCollection 2024.
4
Bridging a Gap in Coherence: The Coordination of Comprehension Processes When Viewing Visual Narratives.弥合连贯性差距:观看视觉叙事时理解过程的协调
Vision (Basel). 2024 Aug 30;8(3):50. doi: 10.3390/vision8030050.
5
Dissociable Neural Mechanisms for Human Inference Processing Predicted by Static and Contextual Language Models.静态和上下文语言模型预测的人类推理处理的可分离神经机制。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Apr 1;5(1):248-263. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00090. eCollection 2024.
6
Modal and amodal cognition: an overarching principle in various domains of psychology.模态与非模态认知:心理学各领域的一个统领性原则。
Psychol Res. 2024 Mar;88(2):307-337. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01878-w. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
7
Causal inference: relating language to event representations and events in the world.因果推理:将语言与事件表征及现实世界中的事件联系起来。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 18;14:1172928. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1172928. eCollection 2023.
8
Do linguistic stimuli activate experiential colour traces related to the entities they refer to and, if so, under what circumstances?语言刺激是否会激活与它们所指实体相关的经验色彩痕迹,如果是,在什么情况下会激活?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Apr;77(4):694-715. doi: 10.1177/17470218231200489. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
9
Knowledge mapping of the research on lexical inferencing: A bibliometric analysis.词汇推理研究的知识图谱:一项文献计量分析。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;14:1101241. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1101241. eCollection 2023.
10
Making and revising predictive inferences during Chinese narrative text reading: Evidence from an electrophysiological study.中文叙事文本阅读过程中预测推理的生成与修正:一项电生理研究的证据
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 13;13:1061725. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1061725. eCollection 2022.