Suppr超能文献

健康计划成员对医疗差错披露的看法。

Health plan members' views about disclosure of medical errors.

作者信息

Mazor Kathleen M, Simon Steven R, Yood Robert A, Martinson Brian C, Gunter Margaret J, Reed George W, Gurwitz Jerry H

机构信息

Meyers Primary Care Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, and Fallon Foundation, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605, USA.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2004 Mar 16;140(6):409-18. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-6-200403160-00006.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Various authorities and national organizations encourage disclosing medical errors, but there is little information on how patients respond to disclosure.

OBJECTIVE

To examine how the type of error, severity of adverse clinical outcome, and level of disclosure affect patients' responses to error and disclosure.

DESIGN

Mail questionnaire survey (8 versions were developed) varying 3 factors in a completely crossed, randomized, factorial design. Each questionnaire included a vignette describing 1) a medical error (failure to check for penicillin allergy or inadequate monitoring of antiepileptic medication); 2) an associated clinical outcome (life-threatening or less serious); and 3) a physician-patient dialogue, with either full disclosure (acceptance of responsibility and an apology) or nondisclosure (expression of regret without acceptance of responsibility or an apology).

SETTING

New England-based health plan.

PARTICIPANTS

Random sample of 1500 adult members received the questionnaire, with a 66% response rate.

MEASUREMENTS

Likelihood of changing physicians, likelihood of seeking legal advice, ratings of patient satisfaction, trust and emotional reaction in response to a vignette and dialogue, and views on medical error and disclosure.

RESULTS

Full disclosure reduced the reported likelihood of changing physicians and increased patient satisfaction, trust, and positive emotional response. Full disclosure reduced the reported likelihood of seeking legal advice in only 1 error-and-outcome vignette. In the other vignettes, the percentage of patients indicating that they would seek legal advice was relatively high even with full disclosure. Almost all respondents (98.8%) wanted to be told of errors, most (83%) favored financial compensation if harm occurred, and few (12.7%) favored compensation if no harm occurred.

LIMITATIONS

Since the study was done in the context of a managed care plan in one geographic area, it could not assess whether the results are generalizable to other populations. In addition, it could not determine whether responses to the simulated situations used predict responses to real situations.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients will probably respond more favorably to physicians who fully disclose medical errors than to physicians who are less forthright, but the specifics of the case and the severity of the clinical outcome also affect patients' responses. In some circumstances, the desire to seek legal advice may not diminish despite full disclosure.

摘要

背景

多个权威机构和国家组织鼓励披露医疗差错,但关于患者对披露的反应的信息却很少。

目的

研究差错类型、不良临床结局的严重程度以及披露程度如何影响患者对差错和披露的反应。

设计

邮件问卷调查(共设计了8个版本),采用完全交叉、随机、析因设计对3个因素进行变化。每份问卷包含一个案例描述,内容包括:1)一个医疗差错(未检查青霉素过敏或对抗癫痫药物监测不足);2)一个相关的临床结局(危及生命或不太严重);3)一段医患对话,要么是完全披露(承担责任并道歉),要么是未披露(表示遗憾但不承担责任或道歉)。

地点

新英格兰地区的健康计划机构。

参与者

随机抽取1500名成年会员作为样本,问卷回复率为66%。

测量指标

更换医生的可能性、寻求法律建议的可能性、对案例及对话的患者满意度评分、信任度评分和情绪反应,以及对医疗差错和披露的看法。

结果

完全披露降低了报告的更换医生的可能性,并提高了患者满意度、信任度和积极情绪反应。完全披露仅在一个差错及结局案例中降低了报告的寻求法律建议的可能性。在其他案例中,即使是完全披露,表明会寻求法律建议的患者比例也相对较高。几乎所有受访者(98.8%)都希望被告知差错,大多数(83%)赞成如果造成伤害应给予经济赔偿,而很少(12.7%)赞成在未造成伤害时给予赔偿。

局限性

由于该研究是在一个地理区域的管理式医疗计划背景下进行的,无法评估结果是否适用于其他人群。此外,无法确定对模拟情景的反应是否能预测对真实情景的反应。

结论

与不太坦率的医生相比,患者可能对完全披露医疗差错的医生反应更积极,但具体案例情况和临床结局的严重程度也会影响患者的反应。在某些情况下,即使完全披露,寻求法律建议的意愿可能也不会减弱。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验