Suppr超能文献

为期4周的重复性心房电重构周期可促进房颤的稳定性:房颤自我持续存在所涉及的第二个因素的时间进程。

Repetitive 4-week periods of atrial electrical remodeling promote stability of atrial fibrillation: time course of a second factor involved in the self-perpetuation of atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Todd Derick M, Fynn Simon P, Walden Andrew P, Hobbs W Julian, Arya Sanjay, Garratt Clifford J

机构信息

Manchester Heart Centre, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Circulation. 2004 Mar 23;109(11):1434-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000124006.84596.D9. Epub 2004 Mar 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Episodes of atrial fibrillation (AF) are known to cause both a rapid reduction in atrial refractoriness (atrial electrical remodeling) and a more delayed increase in AF stability thought to be due to a so-called "second factor." The aim of this study was to quantify the effects and time course of such a factor on AF stability in the chronic goat model.

METHODS AND RESULTS

AF was maintained in 6 goats by burst atrial pacing for 3 consecutive 4-week periods separated a mean of 6+/-2.1 days of sinus rhythm. Six days of sinus rhythm was just sufficient for refractoriness changes to reverse fully in all goats. Atrial effective refractory period, AF inducibility, and duration of individual episodes of AF were assessed at regular intervals. There was a progressive reduction from month 1 to 2 to 3 in the mean duration of burst pacing required to induce individual episodes of AF of 60 seconds (178+/-251, 110+/-102, and 21+/-30 hours), 1 hour (229+/-224, 136+/-104, and 68+/-51 hours), and 24 hours (277+/-218, 192+/-190, and 102+/-75 hours; P<0.03). The frequency with which AF was induced during extrastimulus pacing increased progressively from 16.7% in month 1 to 31.7% in month 2 and 46.9% in month 3 (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential 4-week periods of atrial fibrillation result in a progressive increase in AF stability independent of baseline atrial refractory period. This finding suggests the presence of a second factor in the self-perpetuation of AF with a time course comparable to that of AF-induced ultrastructural changes in the atria.

摘要

背景

已知房颤发作会导致心房不应期迅速缩短(心房电重构),以及因所谓“第二因素”导致房颤稳定性出现更为延迟的增加。本研究旨在量化该因素对慢性山羊模型中房颤稳定性的影响及时间进程。

方法与结果

通过心房猝发起搏在6只山羊中维持房颤状态,持续3个连续的4周周期,其间平均间隔6±2.1天的窦性心律。6天的窦性心律足以使所有山羊的不应期变化完全逆转。定期评估心房有效不应期、房颤诱发性及单个房颤发作的持续时间。从第1个月到第2个月再到第3个月诱导60秒单个房颤发作所需的平均猝发起搏持续时间逐渐缩短(分别为178±251、110±102和21±30小时),诱导1小时单个房颤发作所需的平均猝发起搏持续时间(分别为229±224、136±104和68±51小时),以及诱导24小时单个房颤发作所需的平均猝发起搏持续时间(分别为277±218、192±190和102±75小时;P<0.03)。额外刺激起搏期间诱发房颤的频率从第1个月的16.7%逐渐增加到第2个月的31.7%和第3个月的46.9%(P<0.001)。

结论

连续4周的房颤发作导致房颤稳定性逐渐增加,与基线心房不应期无关。这一发现提示在房颤自我持续存在过程中存在第二因素,其时间进程与房颤引起的心房超微结构变化相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验