Grading evidence.
作者信息
Tevaarwerk Gerald J M
出版信息
CMAJ. 2004 Mar 16;170(6):928-9; author reply 929-30. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1031694.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Grading evidence.
CMAJ. 2004 Mar 16;170(6):928-9; author reply 929-30. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1031694.
2
[Statistical evaluation in Medicina (Buenos Aires)].[《医学统计学评估》（布宜诺斯艾利斯）]
Medicina (B Aires). 2001;61(2):247-8.
3
[Understanding publication standards for evidence-based medicine].[理解循证医学的出版标准]
Presse Med. 2009 Apr;38(4):591-6. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2008.05.021. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
4
Evidence-based medicine vs medicine-based evidence.循证医学与以医学为基础的证据。
Ann Neurol. 2008 Nov;64(5):592. doi: 10.1002/ana.21354.
5
High-quality evidence in oncology from 25th November to 16th December 2004: a summary.2004年11月25日至12月16日肿瘤学领域的高质量证据：总结
Cancer Treat Rev. 2005 Jun;31(4):336-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2005.04.004.
6
Meta-analyses in surgical publications: how qualitative is this evidence-based information?外科出版物中的Meta分析：这种基于证据的信息有多定性？
Ann Surg. 2015 May;261(5):e129-30. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000440.
7
Improving the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials.提高随机对照试验报告的质量。
J Wound Care. 2004 Mar;13(3):103-6. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2004.13.3.26593.
8
[Quality assessment of therapeutic clinical trials].[治疗性临床试验的质量评估]
Internist (Berl). 2000 Apr;41(4):344-8. doi: 10.1007/s001080050516.
9
Statistics in biomedical manuscripts: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers.生物医学稿件中的统计学：编辑对作者和同行评审人员的期望
CMAJ. 1990 Feb 1;142(3):213-4.
10
Standard error or standard deviation?标准误差还是标准差？
Pediatr Cardiol. 2015 Jun;36(5):1105-6. doi: 10.1007/s00246-015-1166-9. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
本文引用的文献
1
Letters, numbers, symbols and words: how to communicate grades of evidence and recommendations.字母、数字、符号和文字：如何传达证据等级和推荐意见。
CMAJ. 2003 Sep 30;169(7):677-80.
2
Are all evidence-based practices alike? Problems in the ranking of evidence.所有基于证据的实践都是一样的吗？证据分级中的问题。
CMAJ. 2003 Sep 30;169(7):672-3.
Zotero 插件